← Search

Weixing Shen

9 accepted papers

2026

LLMS ON TRIAL: Evaluating Judicial Fairness For Large Language Models

ICLR 2026poster

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in high-stakes fields, such as law, where their decisions can directly impact people's lives. When LLMs act as judges, the ability to fairly resolve judicial issues is necessary to ensure their trustworthiness. Based on theories of judicial fairness…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2026

Self-Refine Learning in LLM Multi-Agent Systems for Legal Norm Cognition and Compliance

IJCAI 2026

As large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as autonomous agents in social simulations, ensuring their ability to understand and comply with legal norms is essential. Yet, current LLM agents frequently exhibit reward hacking (RH) behaviors by optimizing metrics at the expense of norm adherenc

Cited by 0Scholar
2025

J&H: Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models Under Knowledge-Injection Attacks in Legal Domain

AAAI 2025technical

As the scale and capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) increase, their applications in knowledge-intensive fields such as legal domain have garnered widespread attention. However, it remains doubtful whether these LLMs make judgments based on domain knowledge for reasoning. If LLMs base their…

2025

JUREX-4E: Juridical Expert-Annotated Four-Element Knowledge Base for Legal Reasoning

EMNLP 2025

In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely applied to legal tasks. To enhance their understanding of legal texts and improve reasoning accuracy, a promising approach is to incorporate legal theories. One of the most widely adopted theories is the Four-Element Theory (FET), which

2024

LEEC for Judicial Fairness: A Legal Element Extraction Dataset with Extensive Extra-Legal Labels

IJCAI 2024poster

An extensive label system is pivotal to facilitate judicial fairness and social justice. Prior empirical research and our interview with legal professionals underscore the importance of extra-legal factors in criminal trials. To help identify sentencing biases and facilitate downstream applications,…

2024

STARD: A Chinese Statute Retrieval Dataset Derived from Real-life Queries by Non-professionals

EMNLP 2024finding

Statute retrieval aims to find relevant statutory articles for specific queries. This process is the basis of a wide range of legal applications such as legal advice, automated judicial decisions, legal document drafting, etc. Existing statute retrieval benchmarks emphasize formal and professional q…

2023

The Devil is in the Details: On the Pitfalls of Event Extraction Evaluation

ACL 2023findings

Event extraction (EE) is a crucial task aiming at extracting events from texts, which includes two subtasks: event detection (ED) and event argument extraction (EAE). In this paper, we check the reliability of EE evaluations and identify three major pitfalls: (1) The data preprocessing discrepancy m…

2023

Unsupervised Legal Evidence Retrieval via Contrastive Learning with Approximate Aggregated Positive

AAAI 2023technical

Verifying the facts alleged by the prosecutors before the trial requires the judges to retrieve evidence within the massive materials accompanied. Existing Legal AI applications often assume the facts are already determined and fail to notice the difficulty of reconstructing them. To build a practic…

2022

LEVEN: A Large-Scale Chinese Legal Event Detection Dataset

ACL 2022findings

Recognizing facts is the most fundamental step in making judgments, hence detecting events in the legal documents is important to legal case analysis tasks. However, existing Legal Event Detection (LED) datasets only concern incomprehensive event types and have limited annotated data, which restrict…