AISTATS 2023poster4 citations

Differentially Private Matrix Completion through Low-rank Matrix Factorization

Lingxiao Wang, Boxin Zhao, Mladen Kolar

Abstract

We study the matrix completion problem under joint differential privacy and develop a non-convex low-rank matrix factorization-based method for solving it. Our method comes with strong privacy and utility guarantees, has a linear convergence rate, and is more scalable than the best-known alternative (Chien et al., 2021). Our method achieves the (near) optimal sample complexity for matrix completion required by the non-private baseline and is much better than the best known result under joint differential privacy. Furthermore, we prove a tight utility guarantee that improves existing approaches and removes the impractical resampling assumption used in the literature. Numerical experiments further demonstrate the superiority of our method.

BibTeX
@InProceedings{pmlr-v206-wang23d,
  title = 	 {Differentially Private Matrix Completion through Low-rank Matrix Factorization},
  author =       {Wang, Lingxiao and Zhao, Boxin and Kolar, Mladen},
  booktitle = 	 {Proceedings of The 26th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics},
  pages = 	 {5731--5748},
  year = 	 {2023},
  editor = 	 {Ruiz, Francisco and Dy, Jennifer and van de Meent, Jan-Willem},
  volume = 	 {206},
  series = 	 {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research},
  month = 	 {25--27 Apr},
  publisher =    {PMLR},
  pdf = 	 {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v206/wang23d/wang23d.pdf},
  url = 	 {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v206/wang23d.html},
  abstract = 	 {We study the matrix completion problem under joint differential privacy and develop a non-convex low-rank matrix factorization-based method for solving it. Our method comes with strong privacy and utility guarantees, has a linear convergence rate, and is more scalable than the best-known alternative (Chien et al., 2021). Our method achieves the (near) optimal sample complexity for matrix completion required by the non-private baseline and is much better than the best known result under joint differential privacy. Furthermore, we prove a tight utility guarantee that improves existing approaches and removes the impractical resampling assumption used in the literature. Numerical experiments further demonstrate the superiority of our method.}
}