How Text Quality Interventions Reshape Neural Scaling Laws for LLMs: Empirical Study

Abstract

Neural scaling laws are widely used for performance projection and resource planning, yet their sensitivity to data quality interventions remains poorly understood. We present an empirical study of how interventions—deduplication, heuristic filtering, and LLM-guided rewriting—reshape scaling behavior in large language model training. Using QualityPajama, a suite of 23 systematically filtered and synthetic datasets, we train over 2,000 models (100M–8B parameters, 100M–200B tokens) to measure how data quality affects scaling-law parameters and compute-optimal design decisions. Our results show that data interventions reshape scaling dynamics in non-trivial ways not captured by current theory, simultaneously moving exponents, coefficients, and constants in conflicting directions that exert opposing forces on loss. For example, an intervention may improve constants but hurt the exponents. Strategies that appear optimal at small scale can reverse at larger scale, and compute-optimal token–parameter ratios can vary by orders of magnitude depending on the intervention. These findings demonstrate that data curation and scaling strategy are deeply intertwined, and that evaluating interventions only at fixed scales can lead to misleading conclusions. We recommend evaluating interventions through their full scaling trajectories using scaling law projections.