Generalization without Systematicity: On the Compositional Skills of Sequence-to-Sequence Recurrent Networks
Abstract
Humans can understand and produce new utterances effortlessly, thanks to their compositional skills. Once a person learns the meaning of a new verb "dax," he or she can immediately understand the meaning of "dax twice" or "sing and dax." In this paper, we introduce the SCAN domain, consisting of a set of simple compositional navigation commands paired with the corresponding action sequences. We then test the zero-shot generalization capabilities of a variety of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) trained on SCAN with sequence-to-sequence methods. We find that RNNs can make successful zero-shot generalizations when the differences between training and test commands are small, so that they can apply "mix-and-match" strategies to solve the task. However, when generalization requires systematic compositional skills (as in the "dax" example above), RNNs fail spectacularly. We conclude with a proof-of-concept experiment in neural machine translation, suggesting that lack of systematicity might be partially responsible for neural networks’ notorious training data thirst.
BibTeX
@InProceedings{pmlr-v80-lake18a,
title = {Generalization without Systematicity: On the Compositional Skills of Sequence-to-Sequence Recurrent Networks},
author = {Lake, Brenden and Baroni, Marco},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning},
pages = {2873--2882},
year = {2018},
editor = {Dy, Jennifer and Krause, Andreas},
volume = {80},
series = {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research},
month = {10--15 Jul},
publisher = {PMLR},
pdf = {http://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/lake18a/lake18a.pdf},
url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/lake18a.html},
abstract = {Humans can understand and produce new utterances effortlessly, thanks to their compositional skills. Once a person learns the meaning of a new verb "dax," he or she can immediately understand the meaning of "dax twice" or "sing and dax." In this paper, we introduce the SCAN domain, consisting of a set of simple compositional navigation commands paired with the corresponding action sequences. We then test the zero-shot generalization capabilities of a variety of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) trained on SCAN with sequence-to-sequence methods. We find that RNNs can make successful zero-shot generalizations when the differences between training and test commands are small, so that they can apply "mix-and-match" strategies to solve the task. However, when generalization requires systematic compositional skills (as in the "dax" example above), RNNs fail spectacularly. We conclude with a proof-of-concept experiment in neural machine translation, suggesting that lack of systematicity might be partially responsible for neural networks’ notorious training data thirst.}
}