MM-RLHF: The Next Step Forward in Multimodal LLM Alignment

Abstract

Existing efforts to align multimodal large language models (MLLMs) with human preferences have only achieved progress in narrow areas, such as hallucination reduction, but remain limited in practical applicability and generalizability. To this end, we introduce **MM-RLHF**, a dataset containing **120k** fine-grained, human-annotated preference comparison pairs. This dataset represents a substantial advancement over existing resources, offering superior size, diversity, annotation granularity, and quality. Leveraging this dataset, we propose several key innovations to improve both the quality of reward models and the efficiency of alignment algorithms. Notably, we introduce the **Critique-Based Reward Model**, which generates critiques of model outputs before assigning scores, offering enhanced interpretability and more informative feedback compared to traditional scalar reward mechanisms. Additionally, we propose **Dynamic Reward Scaling**, a method that adjusts the loss weight of each sample according to the reward signal, thereby optimizing the use of high-quality comparison pairs. Our approach is rigorously evaluated across **10** distinct dimensions, encompassing **27** benchmarks, with results demonstrating significant and consistent improvements in model performance (Figure.1).