PPI Candidate Ranking: Large-Scale Evaluation of a Domain Knowledge–Guided Pipeline

Abstract

Computational approaches have become central to Protein–Protein Interaction (PPI) research, complementing experimental techniques that remain costly and incomplete. While modern deep learning methods capture diverse biological signals and hold promise in expanding the known interactome, empirical validation remains a critical bottleneck due to its long and expensive procedures. To address this challenge, we introduce the problem of PPI candidate ranking, aiming to prioritize interactions for experimental testing. We propose a novel framework that leverages domain knowledge through interpretability-guided ranking and further refines prioritization by integrating complementary sources of evidence, including interaction scores, structural plausibility, and biomedical language features. Evaluations on a large-scale dataset constructed from successive STRING releases demonstrate that our approach yields significant improvements over two state-of-the-art PPI prediction models, providing more accurate and biologically coherent rankings.