IJCAI 2021poster196 citations

Argumentative XAI: A Survey

Kristijonas Čyras, Antonio Rago, Emanuele Albini, Pietro Baroni, Francesca Toni

Abstract

Explainable AI (XAI) has been investigated for decades and, together with AI itself, has witnessed unprecedented growth in recent years. Among various approaches to XAI, argumentative models have been advocated in both the AI and social science literature, as their dialectical nature appears to match some basic desirable features of the explanation activity. In this survey we overview XAI approaches built using methods from the field of computational argumentation, leveraging its wide array of reasoning abstractions and explanation delivery methods. We overview the literature focusing on different types of explanation (intrinsic and post-hoc), different models with which argumentation-based explanations are deployed, different forms of delivery, and different argumentation frameworks they use. We also lay out a roadmap for future work.

Agent-based and multi-agent based systems: GeneralKnowledge representation and reasoning: GeneralMultidisciplinary topics and applications: General
BibTeX
@inproceedings{ijcai2021p600,
  title     = {Argumentative XAI: A Survey},
  author    = {Čyras, Kristijonas and Rago, Antonio and Albini, Emanuele and Baroni, Pietro and Toni, Francesca},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on
               Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI-21}},
  publisher = {International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization},
  editor    = {Zhi-Hua Zhou},
  pages     = {4392--4399},
  year      = {2021},
  month     = {8},
  note      = {Survey Track},
  doi       = {10.24963/ijcai.2021/600},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/600},
}
Argumentative XAI: A Survey · IJCAI 2021