The #DNN-Verification Problem: Counting Unsafe Inputs for Deep Neural Networks
Luca Marzari, Davide Corsi, Ferdinando Cicalese, Alessandro Farinelli
Abstract
Deep Neural Networks are increasingly adopted in critical tasks that require a high level of safety, e.g., autonomous driving. While state-of-the-art verifiers can be employed to check whether a DNN is unsafe w.r.t. some given property (i.e., whether there is at least one unsafe input configuration), their yes/no output is not informative enough for other purposes, such as shielding, model selection, or training improvements. In this paper, we introduce the #DNN-Verification problem, which involves counting the number of input configurations of a DNN that result in a violation of a particular safety property. We analyze the complexity of this problem and propose a novel approach that returns the exact count of violations. Due to the #P-completeness of the problem, we also propose a randomized, approximate method that provides a provable probabilistic bound of the correct count while significantly reducing computational requirements. We present experimental results on a set of safety-critical benchmarks that demonstrate the effectiveness of our approximate method and evaluate the tightness of the bound.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{ijcai2023p25,
title = {The #DNN-Verification Problem: Counting Unsafe Inputs for Deep Neural Networks},
author = {Marzari, Luca and Corsi, Davide and Cicalese, Ferdinando and Farinelli, Alessandro},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI-23}},
publisher = {International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization},
editor = {Edith Elkind},
pages = {217--224},
year = {2023},
month = {8},
note = {Main Track},
doi = {10.24963/ijcai.2023/25},
url = {https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/25},
}