IJCAI 2024poster20 citations

Robust Counterfactual Explanations in Machine Learning: A Survey

Junqi Jiang, Francesco Leofante, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni

Abstract

Counterfactual explanations (CEs) are advocated as being ideally suited to providing algorithmic recourse for subjects affected by the predictions of machine learning models. While CEs can be beneficial to affected individuals, recent work has exposed severe issues related to the robustness of state-of-the-art methods for obtaining CEs. Since a lack of robustness may compromise the validity of CEs, techniques to mitigate this risk are in order. In this survey, we review works in the rapidly growing area of robust CEs and perform an in-depth analysis of the forms of robustness they consider. We also discuss existing solutions and their limitations, providing a solid foundation for future developments.

AI Ethics, Trust, Fairness: ETF: Explainability and interpretabilityAI Ethics, Trust, Fairness: ETF: Safety and robustnessAI Ethics, Trust, Fairness: ETF: Trustworthy AIMachine Learning: ML: Explainable/Interpretable machine learningMachine Learning: ML: RobustnessMachine Learning: ML: Trustworthy machine learning
BibTeX
@inproceedings{ijcai2024p894,
  title     = {Robust Counterfactual Explanations in Machine Learning: A Survey},
  author    = {Jiang, Junqi and Leofante, Francesco and Rago, Antonio and Toni, Francesca},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on
               Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI-24}},
  publisher = {International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization},
  editor    = {Kate Larson},
  pages     = {8086--8094},
  year      = {2024},
  month     = {8},
  note      = {Survey Track},
  doi       = {10.24963/ijcai.2024/894},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2024/894},
}