NeurIPS 2024spotlight5 citations

Can Learned Optimization Make Reinforcement Learning Less Difficult?

Alexander D. Goldie, Chris Lu, Matthew Thomas Jackson, Shimon Whiteson, Jakob Nicolaus Foerster

Abstract

While reinforcement learning (RL) holds great potential for decision making in the real world, it suffers from a number of unique difficulties which often need specific consideration. In particular: it is highly non-stationary; suffers from high degrees of plasticity loss; and requires exploration to prevent premature convergence to local optima and maximize return. In this paper, we consider whether learned optimization can help overcome these problems. Our method, Learned **O**ptimization for **P**lasticity, **E**xploration and **N**on-stationarity (*OPEN*), meta-learns an update rule whose input features and output structure are informed by previously proposed solutions to these difficulties. We show that our parameterization is flexible enough to enable meta-learning in diverse learning contexts, including the ability to use stochasticity for exploration. Our experiments demonstrate that when meta-trained on single and small sets of environments, *OPEN* outperforms or equals traditionally used optimizers. Furthermore, *OPEN* shows strong generalization characteristics across a range of environments and agent architectures.

Meta-LearningReinforcement LearningLearned OptimizationDeep Learning
BibTeX
@inproceedings{
goldie2024can,
title={Can Learned Optimization Make Reinforcement Learning Less Difficult?},
author={Alexander D. Goldie and Chris Lu and Matthew Thomas Jackson and Shimon Whiteson and Jakob Nicolaus Foerster},
booktitle={The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems},
year={2024},
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=YbxFwaSA9Z}
}