Know your limits: Uncertainty estimation with ReLU classifiers fails at reliable OOD detection
Abstract
A crucial requirement for reliable deployment of deep learning models for safety-critical applications is the ability to identify out-of-distribution (OOD) data points, samples which differ from the training data and on which a model might underperform. Previous work has attempted to tackle this problem using uncertainty estimation techniques. However, there is empirical evidence that a large family of these techniques do not detect OOD reliably in classification tasks. This paper gives a theoretical explanation for said experimental findings and illustrates it on synthetic data. We prove that such techniques are not able to reliably identify OOD samples in a classification setting, since their level of confidence is generalized to unseen areas of the feature space. This result stems from the interplay between the representation of ReLU networks as piece-wise affine transformations, the saturating nature of activation functions like softmax, and the most widely-used uncertainty metrics.
BibTeX
@InProceedings{pmlr-v161-ulmer21a,
title = {Know your limits: Uncertainty estimation with ReLU classifiers fails at reliable OOD detection},
author = {Ulmer, Dennis and Cin\`a, Giovanni},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence},
pages = {1766--1776},
year = {2021},
editor = {de Campos, Cassio and Maathuis, Marloes H.},
volume = {161},
series = {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research},
month = {27--30 Jul},
publisher = {PMLR},
pdf = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v161/ulmer21a/ulmer21a.pdf},
url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v161/ulmer21a.html},
abstract = {A crucial requirement for reliable deployment of deep learning models for safety-critical applications is the ability to identify out-of-distribution (OOD) data points, samples which differ from the training data and on which a model might underperform. Previous work has attempted to tackle this problem using uncertainty estimation techniques. However, there is empirical evidence that a large family of these techniques do not detect OOD reliably in classification tasks. This paper gives a theoretical explanation for said experimental findings and illustrates it on synthetic data. We prove that such techniques are not able to reliably identify OOD samples in a classification setting, since their level of confidence is generalized to unseen areas of the feature space. This result stems from the interplay between the representation of ReLU networks as piece-wise affine transformations, the saturating nature of activation functions like softmax, and the most widely-used uncertainty metrics.}
}