Combating the instability of mutual information-based losses via regularization
Abstract
Notable progress has been made in numerous fields of machine learning based on neural network-driven mutual information (MI) bounds. However, utilizing the conventional MI-based losses is often challenging due to their practical and mathematical limitations. In this work, we first identify the symptoms behind their instability: (1) the neural network not converging even after the loss seemed to converge, and (2) saturating neural network outputs causing the loss to diverge. We mitigate both issues by adding a novel regularization term to the existing losses. We theoretically and experimentally demonstrate that added regularization stabilizes training. Finally, we present a novel benchmark that evaluates MI-based losses on both the MI estimation power and its capability on the downstream tasks, closely following the pre-existing supervised and contrastive learning settings. We evaluate six different MI-based losses and their regularized counterparts on multiple benchmarks to show that our approach is simple yet effective.
BibTeX
@InProceedings{pmlr-v180-choi22a,
title = {Combating the instability of mutual information-based losses via regularization},
author = {Choi, Kwanghee and Lee, Siyeong},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence},
pages = {411--421},
year = {2022},
editor = {Cussens, James and Zhang, Kun},
volume = {180},
series = {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research},
month = {01--05 Aug},
publisher = {PMLR},
pdf = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v180/choi22a/choi22a.pdf},
url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v180/choi22a.html},
abstract = {Notable progress has been made in numerous fields of machine learning based on neural network-driven mutual information (MI) bounds. However, utilizing the conventional MI-based losses is often challenging due to their practical and mathematical limitations. In this work, we first identify the symptoms behind their instability: (1) the neural network not converging even after the loss seemed to converge, and (2) saturating neural network outputs causing the loss to diverge. We mitigate both issues by adding a novel regularization term to the existing losses. We theoretically and experimentally demonstrate that added regularization stabilizes training. Finally, we present a novel benchmark that evaluates MI-based losses on both the MI estimation power and its capability on the downstream tasks, closely following the pre-existing supervised and contrastive learning settings. We evaluate six different MI-based losses and their regularized counterparts on multiple benchmarks to show that our approach is simple yet effective.}
}