← Search

Chirag Nagpal

9 accepted papers

2025

Bias in Language Models: Beyond Trick Tests and Towards RUTEd Evaluation

ACL 2025long

Standard bias benchmarks used for large language models (LLMs) measure the association between social attributes in model inputs and single-word model outputs. We test whether these benchmarks are robust to lengthening the model outputs via a more realistic user prompt, in the commonly studied domai…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

Erasing More Than Intended? How Concept Erasure Degrades the Generation of Non-Target Concepts

ICCV 2025poster

Concept erasure techniques have recently gained significant attention for their potential to remove unwanted concepts from text-to-image models. While these methods often demonstrate promising results in controlled settings, their robustness in real-world applications and suitability for deployment…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

InfAlign: Inference-aware language model alignment

ICML 2025poster

Language model alignment is a critical step in training modern generative language models. Alignment targets to improve win rate of a sample from the aligned model against the base model. Today, we are increasingly using inference-time algorithms (e.g., Best-of-$N$ , controlled decoding, tree search…

Cited by 3SourcePDFScholar
2025

Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning

ICLR 2025spotlight

A promising approach for improving reasoning in large language models is to use process reward models (PRMs). PRMs provide feedback at each step of a multi-step reasoning trace, improving credit assignment over outcome reward models (ORMs) that only provide feedback at the final step. However, colle…

Cited by 59SourcePDFScholar
2025

Speech Recognition with LLMs Adapted to Disordered Speech Using Reinforcement Learning

ICASSP 2025accepted

We introduce a large language model (LLM) capable of processing speech inputs and show that tuning it further with reinforcement learning on human preference (RLHF) enables it to adapt better to disordered speech than traditional fine-tuning. Our method replaces low-frequency text tokens in an LLM’s…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Theoretical guarantees on the best-of-n alignment policy

ICML 2025poster

A simple and effective method for the inference-time alignment of generative models is the best-of-$n$ policy, where $n$ samples are drawn from a reference policy, ranked based on a reward function, and the highest ranking one is selected. A commonly used analytical expression in the literature cla…

Cited by 31SourcePDFScholar
2025

Understanding challenges to the interpretation of disaggregated evaluations of algorithmic fairness

NeurIPS 2025poster

Disaggregated evaluation across subgroups is critical for assessing the fairness of machine learning models, but its uncritical use can mislead practitioners. We show that equal performance across subgroups is an unreliable measure of fairness when data are representative of the relevant populations…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2024

Transforming and Combining Rewards for Aligning Large Language Models

ICML 2024poster

A common approach for aligning language models to human preferences is to first learn a reward model from preference data, and then use this reward model to update the language model. We study two closely related problems that arise in this approach. First, any monotone transformation of the reward…

Cited by 9SourcePDFScholar
2023

Participatory Personalization in Classification

NeurIPS 2023spotlight

Machine learning models are often personalized based on information that is protected, sensitive, self-reported, or costly to acquire. These models use information about people, but do not facilitate nor inform their *consent*. Individuals cannot opt out of reporting information that a model needs t…

Cited by 6SourcePDFScholar