← Search

Dongryeol Lee

9 accepted papers

2025

Are LLM-Judges Robust to Expressions of Uncertainty? Investigating the effect of Epistemic Markers on LLM-based Evaluation

NAACL 2025long

In line with the principle of honesty, there has been a growing effort to train large language models (LLMs) to generate outputs containing epistemic markers. However, evaluation in the presence of epistemic markers has been largely overlooked, raising a critical question: Could the use of epistemic…

2025

Can You Trick the Grader? Adversarial Persuasion of LLM Judges

EMNLP 2025

As large language models (LLMs) take on growing roles as automated evaluators in practical settings, a critical question arises: Can individuals persuade an LLM judge to assign unfairly high scores? This study is the first to reveal that strategically embedded persuasive language can bias LLM judges

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

Fooling the LVLM Judges: Visual Biases in LVLM-Based Evaluation

EMNLP 2025

Recently, large vision–language models (LVLMs) have emerged as the preferred tools for judging text–image alignment, yet their robustness along the visual modality remains underexplored. This work is the first study to address a key research question: Can adversarial visual manipulations systematica

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

Generating Diverse Hypotheses for Inductive Reasoning

NAACL 2025long

Inductive reasoning — the process of inferring general rules from a small number of observations — is a fundamental aspect of human intelligence. Recent works suggest that large language models (LLMs) can engage in inductive reasoning by sampling multiple hypotheses about the rules and selecting the…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via Summary-Guided Decoding

NAACL 2025findings

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities in generating detailed and coherent responses from visual inputs.However, they are prone to generate hallucinations due to an over-reliance on language priors. To address this issue, we investigate the language priors in LVLMs…

Cited by 24SourcePDFScholar
2025

Program Synthesis via Test-Time Transduction

NeurIPS 2025poster

We introduce transductive program synthesis, a new formulation of the program synthesis task that explicitly leverages test inputs during synthesis. While prior approaches to program synthesis--whether based on natural language descriptions or input-output examples--typically aim to generalize from…

Cited by 2SourcecodeScholar
2025

Return of EM: Entity-driven Answer Set Expansion for QA Evaluation

COLING 2025main

Recently, directly using large language models (LLMs) has been shown to be the most reliable method to evaluate QA models. However, it suffers from limited interpretability, high cost, and environmental harm. To address these, we propose to use soft exact match (EM) with entity-driven answer set exp…

2025

VLind-Bench: Measuring Language Priors in Large Vision-Language Models

NAACL 2025findings

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated outstanding performance across various multimodal tasks. However, they suffer from a problem known as language prior, where responses are generated based solely on textual patterns while disregarding image information. Addressing the issue of la…

2023

Asking Clarification Questions to Handle Ambiguity in Open-Domain QA

EMNLP 2023long findings

Ambiguous questions persist in open-domain question answering, because formulating a precise question with a unique answer is often challenging. Previous works have tackled this issue by asking disambiguated questions for all possible interpretations of the ambiguous question. Instead, we propose to…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar