← Search

Ekaterina Fadeeva

5 accepted papers

2026

Don't Throw Away Your Beams: Improving Consistency-based Uncertainties in LLMs via Beam Search

ICLR 2026poster

Consistency-based methods have emerged as an effective approach to uncertainty quantification (UQ) in large language models. These methods typically rely on several generations obtained via multinomial sampling, measuring their agreement level. However, in short-form QA, multinomial sampling is pron…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

Efficient Hallucination Detection for LLMs Using Uncertainty-Aware Attention Heads

ICML 2026poster

Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has led to systems capable of producing text with remarkable fluency. However, these models are still prone to factual inaccuracies, often referred to as \``hallucinations''. One strategy to alleviate this issue is uncertainty quantification (UQ), but …

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

A Head to Predict and a Head to Question: Pre-trained Uncertainty Quantification Heads for Hallucination Detection in LLM Outputs

EMNLP 2025

LLMs have the tendency to hallucinate, i.e., to sporadically generate false or fabricated information, and users generally lack the tools to detect when this happens. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) provides a framework for assessing the reliability of model outputs, aiding in the identification of

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

Unconditional Truthfulness: Learning Unconditional Uncertainty of Large Language Models

EMNLP 2025

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) has emerged as a promising approach for detecting hallucinations and low-quality output of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, obtaining proper uncertainty scores is complicated by the conditional dependency between the generation steps of an autoregressive LLM, be

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2024

Fact-Checking the Output of Large Language Models via Token-Level Uncertainty Quantification

ACL 2024findings

Large language models (LLMs) are notorious for hallucinating, i.e., producing erroneous claims in their output. Such hallucinations can be dangerous, as occasional factual inaccuracies in the generated text might be obscured by the rest of the output being generally factually correct, making it extr…