4 accepted papers
ML attacks on Learning with Errors (LWE) with binary or small secrets only succeed on LWE settings with very simple secrets. For example, they can recover secrets with up to three non-zero bits when models are trained on not-reduced LWE data, and three non-zero bits in the ''cruel region'' [9] when …
Recent work showed that ML-based attacks on Learning with Errors (LWE), a hard problem used in post-quantum cryptography, outperform classical algebraic attacks in certain settings. Although promising, ML attacks struggle to scale to more complex LWE settings. Prior work connected this issue to the…
AI-powered attacks on Learning with Errors (LWE)—an important hard math problem in post-quantum cryptography—rival or outperform "classical" attacks on LWE under certain parameter settings. Despite the promise of this approach, a dearth of accessible data limits AI practitioners' ability to study an…
While several types of post hoc explanation methods have been proposed in recent literature, there is very little work on systematically benchmarking these methods. Here, we introduce OpenXAI, a comprehensive and extensible open-source framework for evaluating and benchmarking post hoc explanation m…