4 accepted papers
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often suffer from overthinking due to redundant verification steps. Existing approaches for mitigating overthinking, such as fast-slow thinking switching and reasoning trajectory compression, fail to make a fine-grained distinction between beneficial and redundant steps
Virtual Knowledge Graphs (VKGs) provide an effective solution for data integration by mapping heterogeneous data sources to a unified ontology. However, existing VKG construction frameworks primarily focus on one-shot construction, which often results in partial data coverage and support for only in
Virtual Knowledge Graphs (VKGs) provide unified access to legacy relational data sources through a high-level ontology modeling a domain of interest. The content of the ontology elements (classes and properties) is virtually mapped to underlying data sources through declarative mappings. The standar
Virtual Knowledge Graphs (VKGs) provide an effective solution for data integration but typically require significant expertise for their construction. This process, involving ontology development, schema analysis, and mapping creation, is often hindered by naming ambiguities and matching issues, whi