3 accepted papers
LLMs are known to exhibit _sycophancy_: agreeing with and flattering users, even at the cost of correctness. Prior work measures sycophancy only as direct agreement with users' explicitly stated beliefs that can be compared to a ground truth. This fails to capture broader forms of sycophancy such as…
The tendency of users to anthropomorphise large language models (LLMs) is of growing societal interest. Here, we present AnthroBench: a novel empirical method and tool for evaluating anthropomorphic LLM behaviours in realistic settings. Our work introduces three key advances; first, we develop a mul…
Evaluating large language models (LLMs) is crucial for both assessing their capabilities and identifying safety or robustness issues prior to deployment. Reliably measuring abstract and complex phenomena such as `safety' and `robustness' requires strong construct validity, that is, having measures t…