← Search

Senthooran Rajamanoharan

8 accepted papers

2026

Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful

ICML 2026poster

Recent studies indicate that when faced with explicit biases in prompts, models often omit mentioning these biases in their Chain-of-Thought (CoT) output, revealing that verbalized reasoning can give an incorrect picture of how models arrive at conclusions (unfaithfulness). In this work, we show tha…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2026

Emergent Misalignment is Easy, Narrow Misalignment is Hard

ICLR 2026poster

Finetuning large language models on narrowly harmful datasets can cause them to become emergently misaligned, giving stereotypically `evil' responses across diverse unrelated settings. Concerningly, a pre-registered survey of experts failed to predict this result, highlighting our poor understanding…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2026

Steering Out-of-Distribution Generalization with Concept Ablation Fine-Tuning

ICML 2026poster

Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) can lead to unintended out-of-distribution generalization. Standard approaches to this problem rely on modifying the training data, for example by adding data that better specify the intended generalization. However, this is not always practical. We introduce…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

Thought Branches: Interpreting LLM Reasoning Requires Resampling

ICLR 2026poster

We argue that interpreting reasoning models from a single chain-of-thought (CoT) is fundamentally inadequate. To understand computation and causal influence, one must study reasoning as a distribution of possible trajectories elicited by a given prompt. We approximate this distribution via on-policy…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probing

ICML 2025poster

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a popular method for interpreting concepts represented in large language model (LLM) activations. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the validity of their interpretations due to the lack of a ground truth for the concepts used by an LLM, and a growing numbe…

2025

Dense SAE Latents Are Features, Not Bugs

NeurIPS 2025poster

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are designed to extract interpretable features from language models by enforcing a sparsity constraint. Ideally, training an SAE would yield latents that are both sparse and semantically meaningful. However, many SAE latents activate frequently (i.e., are *dense*), raising…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Do I Know This Entity? Knowledge Awareness and Hallucinations in Language Models

ICLR 2025oral

Hallucinations in large language models are a widespread problem, yet the mechanisms behind whether models will hallucinate are poorly understood, limiting our ability to solve this problem. Using sparse autoencoders as an interpretability tool, we discover that a key part of these mechanisms is ent…

Cited by 10SourcePDFScholar
2024

Improving Sparse Decomposition of Language Model Activations with Gated Sparse Autoencoders

NeurIPS 2024poster

Recent work has found that sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are an effective technique for unsupervised discovery of interpretable features in language models' (LMs) activations, by finding sparse, linear reconstructions of those activations. We introduce the Gated Sparse Autoencoder (Gated SAE), which ac…

Cited by 6SourcePDFScholar