← Search

Yuhui Li

5 accepted papers

2025

EAGLE-3: Scaling up Inference Acceleration of Large Language Models via Training-Time Test

NeurIPS 2025poster

The sequential nature of modern LLMs makes them expensive and slow, and speculative sam- pling has proven to be an effective solution to this problem. Methods like EAGLE perform autoregression at the feature level, reusing top- layer features from the target model to achieve better results than vani…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2025

OmniVTON: Training-Free Universal Virtual Try-On

ICCV 2025poster

Image-based Virtual Try-On (VTON) techniques rely on either supervised in-shop approaches, which ensure high fidelity but struggle with cross-domain generalization, or unsupervised in-the-wild methods, which improve adaptability but remain constrained by data biases and limited universality. A unifi…

2024

EAGLE-2: Faster Inference of Language Models with Dynamic Draft Trees

EMNLP 2024main

Inference with modern Large Language Models (LLMs) is expensive and time-consuming, and speculative sampling has proven to be an effective solution. Most speculative sampling methods such as EAGLE use a static draft tree, implicitly assuming that the acceptance rate of draft tokens depends only on t…

2024

EAGLE: Speculative Sampling Requires Rethinking Feature Uncertainty

ICML 2024poster

Autoregressive decoding makes the inference of Large Language Models (LLMs) time-consuming. In this paper, we reconsider speculative sampling and derive two key observations. Firstly, autoregression at the feature (second-to-top-layer) level is more straightforward than at the token level. Secondly,…

2024

RAIN: Your Language Models Can Align Themselves without Finetuning

ICLR 2024poster

Large language models (LLMs) often demonstrate inconsistencies with human preferences. Previous research typically gathered human preference data and then aligned the pre-trained models using reinforcement learning or instruction tuning, a.k.a. the finetuning step. In contrast, aligning frozen LLMs…