5 accepted papers
Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong downstream performance largely due to abundant supervised fine-tuning (SFT) data that imparts problem-solving capabilities. However, as applications expand, high-quality SFT data in knowledge-intensive verticals (e.g., humanities and social sciences, medic…
Identifying bias in LLM-generated content is a crucial prerequisite for ensuring fairness in LLMs. Existing methods, such as fairness classifiers and LLM-based judges, face limitations related to difficulties in understanding underlying intentions and the lack of criteria for fairness judgment. In t…
The increasing deployment of large language model (LLM)-based chatbots has raised concerns regarding fairness. Fairness issues in LLMs may result in serious consequences, such as bias amplification, discrimination, and harm to minority groups. Many efforts are dedicated to evaluating and mitigating…
Large language models (LLMs) are prone to capturing biases from training corpus, leading to potential negative social impacts. Existing prompt-based debiasing methods exhibit instability due to their sensitivity to prompt changes, while fine-tuning-based techniques incur substantial computational ov…
Evaluating the bias of LLMs becomes more crucial with their rapid development. However, existing evaluation approaches rely on fixed-form outputs and cannot adapt to the flexible open-text generation scenarios of LLMs (e.g., sentence completion and question answering). To address this, we introduce…