Taxonomizing and Measuring Representational Harms: A Look at Image Tagging
Jared Katzman, Angelina Wang, Morgan Scheuerman, Su Lin Blodgett, Kristen Laird, Hanna Wallach, Solon Barocas
Abstract
In this paper, we examine computational approaches for measuring the "fairness" of image tagging systems, finding that they cluster into five distinct categories, each with its own analytic foundation. We also identify a range of normative concerns that are often collapsed under the terms "unfairness," "bias," or even "discrimination" when discussing problematic cases of image tagging. Specifically, we identify four types of representational harms that can be caused by image tagging systems, providing concrete examples of each. We then consider how different computational measurement approaches map to each of these types, demonstrating that there is not a one-to-one mapping. Our findings emphasize that no single measurement approach will be definitive and that it is not possible to infer from the use of a particular measurement approach which type of harm was intended to be measured. Lastly, equipped with this more granular understanding of the types of representational harms that can be caused by image tagging systems, we show that attempts to mitigate some of these types of harms may be in tension with one another.
BibTeX
@article{Katzman_Wang_Scheuerman_Blodgett_Laird_Wallach_Barocas_2023, title={Taxonomizing and Measuring Representational Harms: A Look at Image Tagging}, volume={37}, url={https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/26670}, DOI={10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26670}, abstractNote={In this paper, we examine computational approaches for measuring the "fairness" of image tagging systems, finding that they cluster into five distinct categories, each with its own analytic foundation. We also identify a range of normative concerns that are often collapsed under the terms "unfairness," "bias," or even "discrimination" when discussing problematic cases of image tagging. Specifically, we identify four types of representational harms that can be caused by image tagging systems, providing concrete examples of each. We then consider how different computational measurement approaches map to each of these types, demonstrating that there is not a one-to-one mapping. Our findings emphasize that no single measurement approach will be definitive and that it is not possible to infer from the use of a particular measurement approach which type of harm was intended to be measured. Lastly, equipped with this more granular understanding of the types of representational harms that can be caused by image tagging systems, we show that attempts to mitigate some of these types of harms may be in tension with one another.}, number={12}, journal={Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence}, author={Katzman, Jared and Wang, Angelina and Scheuerman, Morgan and Blodgett, Su Lin and Laird, Kristen and Wallach, Hanna and Barocas, Solon}, year={2023}, month={Jun.}, pages={14277-14285} }