← Search

Angelina Wang

11 accepted papers

2026

Who Evaluates AI's Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage and Gaps in First and Third Party Evaluations

ICML 2026poster

Foundation models are increasingly central to high-stakes AI systems, and governance frameworks now depend on evaluations to assess their risks and capabilities. Although general capability evaluations are widespread, social impact assessments covering bias, fairness, privacy, environmental costs, a…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Fairness through Difference Awareness: Measuring Desired Group Discrimination in LLMs

ACL 2025long

Algorithmic fairness has conventionally adopted the mathematically convenient perspective of racial color-blindness (i.e., difference unaware treatment). However, we contend that in a range of important settings, group difference awareness matters. For example, differentiating between groups may be…

2025

Position: Evaluating Generative AI Systems Is a Social Science Measurement Challenge

ICML 2025poster

The measurement tasks involved in evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems lack sufficient scientific rigor, leading to what has been described as "a tangle of sloppy tests [and] apples-to-oranges comparisons" (Roose, 2024). In this position paper, we argue that the ML community would benefit from l…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

Rigor in AI: Doing Rigorous AI Work Requires a Broader, Responsible AI-Informed Conception of Rigor

NeurIPS 2025poster

In AI research and practice, rigor remains largely understood in terms of methodological rigor---such as whether mathematical, statistical, or computational methods are correctly applied. We argue that this narrow conception of rigor has contributed to the concerns raised by the responsible AI commu…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2023

Gender Artifacts in Visual Datasets

ICCV 2023poster

Gender biases are known to exist within large-scale visual datasets and can be reflected or even amplified in downstream models. Many prior works have proposed methods for mitigating gender biases, often by attempting to remove gender expression information from images. To understand the feasibility…

Cited by 36PDFScholar
2023

Taxonomizing and Measuring Representational Harms: A Look at Image Tagging

AAAI 2023technical

In this paper, we examine computational approaches for measuring the "fairness" of image tagging systems, finding that they cluster into five distinct categories, each with its own analytic foundation. We also identify a range of normative concerns that are often collapsed under the terms "unfairnes…

Cited by 52SourcePDFScholar
2020

REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasets

ECCV 2020poster

Machine learning models are known to perpetuate and even amplify the biases present in the data. However, these data biases frequently do not become apparent until after the models are deployed. To tackle this issue and to enable the preemptive analysis of large-scale dataset, we present our tool. R…

2019

Learning Robotic Manipulation through Visual Planning and Acting

RSS 2019poster

Planning for robotic manipulation requires reasoning about the changes a robot can affect on objects. When such interactions can be modelled analytically, as in domains with rigid objects, efficient planning algorithms exist. However, in both domestic and industrial domains, the objects of interest…

Cited by 158SourcePDFScholar