Queries, Representation & Detection: The Next 100 Model Fingerprinting Schemes
Augustin Godinot, Erwan Le Merrer, Camilla Penzo, Francois Taiani, Gilles Tredan
Abstract
The deployment of machine learning models in operational contexts represents a significant investment for any organisation. Consequently, the risk of these models being misappropriated by competitors needs to be addressed. In recent years, numerous proposals have been put forth to detect instances of model stealing. However, these proposals operate under implicit and disparate data and model access assumptions; as a consequence, it remains unclear how they can be effectively compared to one another. Our evaluation shows that a simple baseline that we introduce performs on par with existing state-of-the-art fingerprints, which, on the other hand, are much more complex. To uncover the reasons behind this intriguing result, this paper introduces a systematic approach to both the creation of model fingerprinting schemes and their evaluation benchmarks. By dividing model fingerprinting into three core components – Query, Representation and Detection (QuRD) – we are able to identify ~100 previously unexplored QuRD combinations and gain insights into their performance. Finally, we introduce a set of metrics to compare and guide the creation of more representative model stealing detection benchmarks. Our approach reveals the need for more challenging benchmarks and a sound comparison with baselines. To foster the creation of new fingerprinting schemes and benchmarks, we open-source our fingerprinting toolbox.
BibTeX
@article{Godinot_Merrer_Penzo_Taiani_Tredan_2025, title={Queries, Representation & Detection: The Next 100 Model Fingerprinting Schemes}, volume={39}, url={https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/33848}, DOI={10.1609/aaai.v39i16.33848}, abstractNote={The deployment of machine learning models in operational contexts represents a significant investment for any organisation. Consequently, the risk of these models being misappropriated by competitors needs to be addressed. In recent years, numerous proposals have been put forth to detect instances of model stealing. However, these proposals operate under implicit and disparate data and model access assumptions; as a consequence, it remains unclear how they can be effectively compared to one another. Our evaluation shows that a simple baseline that we introduce performs on par with existing state-of-the-art fingerprints, which, on the other hand, are much more complex. To uncover the reasons behind this intriguing result, this paper introduces a systematic approach to both the creation of model fingerprinting schemes and their evaluation benchmarks. By dividing model fingerprinting into three core components – Query, Representation and Detection (QuRD) – we are able to identify ~100 previously unexplored QuRD combinations and gain insights into their performance. Finally, we introduce a set of metrics to compare and guide the creation of more representative model stealing detection benchmarks. Our approach reveals the need for more challenging benchmarks and a sound comparison with baselines. To foster the creation of new fingerprinting schemes and benchmarks, we open-source our fingerprinting toolbox.}, number={16}, journal={Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence}, author={Godinot, Augustin and Merrer, Erwan Le and Penzo, Camilla and Taiani, Francois and Tredan, Gilles}, year={2025}, month={Apr.}, pages={16817-16825} }