Do I have the Knowledge to Answer? Investigating Answerability of Knowledge Base Questions
Mayur Patidar, Prayushi Faldu, Avinash Singh, Lovekesh Vig, Indrajit Bhattacharya, Mausam
Abstract
When answering natural language questions over knowledge bases, missing facts, incomplete schema and limited scope naturally lead to many questions being unanswerable. While answerability has been explored in other QA settings, it has not been studied for QA over knowledge bases (KBQA). We create GrailQAbility, a new benchmark KBQA dataset with unanswerability, by first identifying various forms of KB incompleteness that make questions unanswerable, and then systematically adapting GrailQA (a popular KBQA dataset with only answerable questions). Experimenting with three state-of-the-art KBQA models, we find that all three models suffer a drop in performance even after suitable adaptation for unanswerable questions. In addition, these often detect unanswerability for wrong reasons and find specific forms of unanswerability particularly difficult to handle. This underscores the need for further research in making KBQA systems robust to unanswerability.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{patidar-etal-2023-knowledge,
title = "Do {I} have the Knowledge to Answer? Investigating Answerability of Knowledge Base Questions",
author = "Patidar, Mayur and
Faldu, Prayushi and
Singh, Avinash and
Vig, Lovekesh and
Bhattacharya, Indrajit and
Mausam",
editor = "Rogers, Anna and
Boyd-Graber, Jordan and
Okazaki, Naoaki",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
month = jul,
year = "2023",
address = "Toronto, Canada",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2023.acl-long.576/",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.576",
pages = "10341--10357"
}