ICML 2026poster0 citations

Is Training Necessary for Anomaly Detection?

Xingwu Zhang, Guanxuan Li, Paul Henderson, Gerardo Aragon-Camarasa, ZIJUN LONG

Abstract

Current state-of-the-art multi-class unsupervised anomaly detection (MUAD) methods rely on training encoder–decoder models to reconstruct anomaly-free features. We first show these approaches have an inherent fidelity–stability dilemma in how they detect anomalies via reconstruction residuals. We then abandon the reconstruction paradigm entirely and propose Retrieval-based Anomaly Detection (RAD). RAD is a training-free approach that stores anomaly-free features in a memory and detects anomalies through multi-level retrieval, matching test patches against the memory. Experiments demonstrate that RAD achieves state-of-the-art performance across four established benchmarks (MVTec-AD, VisA, Real-IAD, 3D-ADAM) under both standard and few-shot settings. On MVTec-AD, RAD reaches 96.7% Pixel AUROC with just a single anomaly-free image compared to 98.5% of RAD's full-data performance. We further prove that retrieval-based scores theoretically upper-bound reconstruction-residual scores. Collectively, these findings overturn the assumption that MUAD requires task-specific training, showing that state-of-the-art anomaly detection is feasible with memory-based retrieval. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/RAD-3A6C.

TheoryVisionRetrievalBenchmark
BibTeX
@inproceedings{
zhang2026is,
title={Is Task-Specific Training Necessary for Anomaly Detection?},
author={Xingwu Zhang and Guanxuan Li and Paul Henderson and Gerardo Aragon-Camarasa and ZIJUN LONG},
booktitle={Forty-third International Conference on Machine Learning},
year={2026},
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=0Qudez0gLp}
}