← Search

Amanda Cercas Curry

12 accepted papers

2025

Language Model Council: Democratically Benchmarking Foundation Models on Highly Subjective Tasks

NAACL 2025long

As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to evolve, evaluating them remains a persistent challenge. Many recent evaluations use LLMs as judges to score outputs from other LLMs, often relying on a single large model like GPT-4o. However, using a single LLM judge is prone to intra-model bias, and many…

2025

Seeing Race, Feeling Bias: Emotion Stereotyping in Multimodal Language Models

EMNLP 2025

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to predict human emotions, but previous studies show that these models reproduce gendered emotion stereotypes. Emotion stereotypes are also tightly tied to race and skin tone (consider for example the trope of the angry black woman), but previous wo

Cited by 4SourcePDFScholar
2025

The AI Gap: How Socioeconomic Status Affects Language Technology Interactions

ACL 2025long

Socioeconomic status (SES) fundamentally influences how people interact with each other and, more recently, with digital technologies like large language models (LLMs). While previous research has highlighted the interaction between SES and language technology, it was limited by reliance on proxy me…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

Your Mileage May Vary: How Empathy and Demographics Shape Human Preferences in LLM Responses

EMNLP 2025

As large language models (LLMs) increasingly assist in subjective decision-making (e.g., moral reasoning, advice), it is critical to understand whose preferences they align with—and why. While prior work uses aggregate human judgments, demographic variation and its linguistic drivers remain underexp

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2024

Angry Men, Sad Women: Large Language Models Reflect Gendered Stereotypes in Emotion Attribution

ACL 2024long

Large language models (LLMs) reflect societal norms and biases, especially about gender. While societal biases and stereotypes have been extensively researched in various NLP applications, there is a surprising gap for emotion analysis. However, emotion and gender are closely linked in societal disc…

2024

Classist Tools: Social Class Correlates with Performance in NLP

ACL 2024long

The field of sociolinguistics has studied factors affecting language use for the last century. Labov (1964) and Bernstein (1960) showed that socioeconomic class strongly influences our accents, syntax and lexicon. However, despite growing concerns surrounding fairness and bias in Natural Language Pr…

2024

Divine LLaMAs: Bias, Stereotypes, Stigmatization, and Emotion Representation of Religion in Large Language Models

EMNLP 2024finding

Emotions play important epistemological and cognitive roles in our lives, revealing our values and guiding our actions. Previous work has shown that LLMs display biases in emotion attribution along gender lines. However, unlike gender, which says little about our values, religion, as a socio-cultura…

Cited by 6SourcePDFScholar
2024

Emotion Analysis in NLP: Trends, Gaps and Roadmap for Future Directions

COLING 2024main

Emotions are a central aspect of communication. Consequently, emotion analysis (EA) is a rapidly growing field in natural language processing (NLP). However, there is no consensus on scope, direction, or methods. In this paper, we conduct a thorough review of 154 relevant NLP publications from the l…

2024

Impoverished Language Technology: The Lack of (Social) Class in NLP

COLING 2024main

Since Labov’s foundational 1964 work on the social stratification of language, linguistics has dedicated concerted efforts towards understanding the relationships between socio-demographic factors and language production and perception. Despite the large body of evidence identifying significant rela…

Cited by 2SourcePDFScholar
2023

Mirages. On Anthropomorphism in Dialogue Systems

EMNLP 2023long main

Automated dialogue or conversational systems are anthropomorphised by developers and personified by users. While a degree of anthropomorphism is inevitable, conscious and unconscious design choices can guide users to personify them to varying degrees. Encouraging users to relate to automated systems…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2021

ConvAbuse: Data, Analysis, and Benchmarks for Nuanced Abuse Detection in Conversational AI

EMNLP 2021main

We present the first English corpus study on abusive language towards three conversational AI systems gathered ‘in the wild’: an open-domain social bot, a rule-based chatbot, and a task-based system. To account for the complexity of the task, we take a more ‘nuanced’ approach where our ConvAI datase…