Borhane Blili-Hamelin — accepted AI-conference papers

2025

Position: In-House Evaluation Is Not Enough. Towards Robust Third-Party Evaluation and Flaw Disclosure for General-Purpose AI

Shayne Longpre, Kevin Klyman, Ruth Elisabeth Appel, Sayash Kapoor, Rishi Bommasani, Michelle Sahar +28

ICML 2025spotlight

The widespread deployment of general-purpose AI (GPAI) systems introduces significant new risks. Yet the infrastructure, practices, and norms for reporting flaws in GPAI systems remain seriously underdeveloped, lagging far behind more established fields like software security. Based on a collaborati…

Cited by 0 Source ↗PDF ↗Scholar ↗

2025

Position: Stop treating `AGI' as the north-star goal of AI research

Borhane Blili-Hamelin, Christopher Graziul, Leif Hancox-Li, Hananel Hazan, El-Mahdi El-Mhamdi, Avijit Ghosh +10

ICML 2025poster

The AI research community plays a vital role in shaping the scientific, engineering, and societal goals of AI research. In this position paper, we argue that focusing on the highly contested topic of 'artificial general intelligence' ('AGI') undermines our ability to choose effective goals. We ident…

Cited by 0 Source ↗PDF ↗Scholar ↗

2024

Position: A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teaming

Shayne Longpre, Sayash Kapoor, Kevin Klyman, Ashwin Ramaswami, Rishi Bommasani, Borhane Blili-Hamelin +17

ICML 2024oral

Independent evaluation and red teaming are critical for identifying the risks posed by generative AI systems. However, the terms of service and enforcement strategies used by prominent AI companies to deter model misuse have disincentives on good faith safety evaluations. This causes some researcher…

Cited by 5 Source ↗PDF ↗Scholar ↗