← Search

Dylan P. Losey

29 accepted papers

2025

RECON: Reducing Causal Confusion with Human-Placed Markers

IROS 2025

Imitation learning enables robots to learn new tasks from human examples. One fundamental limitation while learning from humans is causal confusion. Causal confusion occurs when the robot’s observations include both task-relevant and extraneous information: for instance, a robot’s camera might see n

Cited by 3SourceScholar
2025

Stable-BC: Controlling Covariate Shift With Stable Behavior Cloning

RA-L 2025

Behavior cloning is a common imitation learning paradigm. Under behavior cloning the robot collects expert demonstrations, and then trains a policy to match the actions taken by the expert. This works well when the robot learner visits states where the expert has already demonstrated the correct act

Cited by 15SourcecodeScholar
2025

Using High-Level Patterns to Estimate How Humans Predict a Robot will Behave

IROS 2025

Humans interacting with robots often form predictions of what the robot will do next. For instance, based on the recent behavior of an autonomous car, a nearby human driver might predict that the car is going to remain in the same lane. It is important for the robot to understand the human’s predict

Cited by 1SourceScholar
2024

Aligning Learning with Communication in Shared Autonomy

IROS 2024poster

Assistive robot arms can help humans by partially automating their desired tasks. Consider an adult with motor impairments controlling an assistive robot arm to eat dinner. The robot can reduce the number of human inputs — and how precise those inputs need to be — by recognizing what the human wants…

Cited by 1SourceScholar
2024

Waypoint-Based Reinforcement Learning for Robot Manipulation Tasks

IROS 2024poster

Robot arms should be able to learn new tasks. One framework here is reinforcement learning, where the robot is given a reward function that encodes the task, and the robot autonomously learns actions to maximize its reward. Existing approaches to reinforcement learning often frame this problem as a…

Cited by 6SourcecodeScholar
2023

Coordinated Multi-Robot Shared Autonomy Based on Scheduling and Demonstrations

RA-L 2023

Shared autonomy methods, where a human operator and a robot arm work together, have enabled robots to complete a range of complex and highly variable tasks. Existing work primarily focuses on one human sharing autonomy with a <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http:/

Cited by 5SourceScholar
2023

Towards Robots that Influence Humans over Long-Term Interaction

ICRA 2023poster

When humans interact with robots influence is inevitable. Consider an autonomous car driving near a human: the speed and steering of the autonomous car will affect how the human drives. Prior works have developed frameworks that enable robots to influence humans towards desired behaviors. But while…

Cited by 9SourceScholar
2022

Assisting Operators of Articulated Machinery with Optimal Planning and Goal Inference

ICRA 2022poster

Operating an articulated machine is a complex and hierarchical task, involving several levels of decision making. Motivated by the timber-harvesting applications of these machines, we are interested in developing a collaborative framework for operating an articulated machine/robot in order to increa…

Cited by 11SourceScholar
2021

Communicating Inferred Goals With Passive Augmented Reality and Active Haptic Feedback

RA-L 2021

Robots learn as they interact with humans. Consider a human teleoperating an assistive robot arm: as the human guides and corrects the arm's motion, the robot gathers information about the human's desired task. But how does the human know what their robot has inferred? Today's approaches often focus

Cited by 34SourceScholar
2021

I Know What You Meant: Learning Human Objectives by (Under)estimating Their Choice Set

ICRA 2021poster

Assistive robots have the potential to help people perform everyday tasks. However, these robots first need to learn what it is their user wants them to do. Teaching assistive robots is hard for inexperienced users, elderly users, and users living with physical disabilities, since often these indivi…

Cited by 21SourceScholar
2021

Learning Human Objectives from Sequences of Physical Corrections

ICRA 2021poster

When personal, assistive, and interactive robots make mistakes, humans naturally and intuitively correct those mistakes through physical interaction. In simple situations, one correction is sufficient to convey what the human wants. But when humans are working with multiple robots or the robot is pe…

Cited by 44SourceScholar
2020

Controlling Assistive Robots with Learned Latent Actions

ICRA 2020poster

Assistive robotic arms enable users with physical disabilities to perform everyday tasks without relying on a caregiver. Unfortunately, the very dexterity that makes these arms useful also makes them challenging to teleoperate: the robot has more degrees-of-freedom than the human can directly coordi…

Cited by 97SourceScholar
2019

Asking Easy Questions: A User-Friendly Approach to Active Reward Learning

CoRL 2019

Robots can learn the right reward function by querying a human expert. Existing approaches attempt to choose questions where the robot is most uncertain about the human’s response; however, they do not consider how easy it will be for the human to answer! In this paper we explore an information gain

2019

Learning from My Partner’s Actions: Roles in Decentralized Robot Teams

CoRL 2019

When teams of robots collaborate to complete a task, communication is often necessary. Like humans, robot teammates should implicitly communicate through their actions: but interpreting our partner’s actions is typically difficult, since a given action may have many different underlying reasons. Her

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2017

Learning Robot Objectives from Physical Human Interaction

CoRL 2017

When humans and robots work in close proximity, physical interaction is inevitable. Traditionally, robots treat physical interaction as a disturbance, and resume their original behavior after the interaction ends. In contrast, we argue that physical human interaction is informative: it is useful inf

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar