6 accepted papers
We study the problem of training a risk-sensitive reinforcement learning (RL) agent through imitation learning (IL). Unlike standard IL, our goal is not only to train an agent that matches the expert’s expected return (i.e., its *average performance*) but also its *risk attitude* (i.e., other featur…
In Reward Learning (ReL), we are given feedback on an unknown target reward, and the goal is to use this information to recover it in order to carry out some downstream application, e.g., planning. When the feedback is not informative enough, the target reward is only partially identifiable, i.e., t…
Although it is well-known that humans commonly engage in *risk-sensitive* behaviors in the presence of stochasticity, most Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) models assume a *risk-neutral* agent. As such, beyond $(i)$ introducing model misspecification, $(ii)$ they do not permit direct inference o…
In online Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL), the learner can collect samples about the dynamics of the environment to improve its estimate of the reward function. Since IRL suffers from identifiability issues, many theoretical works on online IRL focus on estimating the entire set of rewards that…
*Inverse reinforcement learning* (IRL) aims to recover the reward function of an *expert* agent from demonstrations of behavior. It is well-known that the IRL problem is fundamentally ill-posed, i.e., many reward functions can explain the demonstrations. For this reason, IRL has been recently refram…
Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) denotes a powerful family of algorithms for recovering a reward function justifying the behavior demonstrated by an expert agent. A well-known limitation of IRL is the ambiguity in the choice of the reward function, due to the existence of multiple rewards that e…