← Search

Hoda Heidari

14 accepted papers

2026

Moral Change or Noise? On Problems of Aligning AI with Temporally Unstable Human Feedback

AAAI 2026technical

Alignment methods in moral domains seek to elicit moral preferences of human stakeholders and incorporate them into AI. This presupposes moral preferences as static targets, but such preferences often evolve over time. Proper alignment of AI to dynamic human preferences should ideally account for "l

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2026

Towards Cognitively-Faithful Decision-Making Models to Improve AI Alignment

ICLR 2026poster

Recent AI trends seek to align AI models to learned human-centric objectives, such as personal preferences, utility, or societal values. Using standard preference elicitation methods, researchers and practitioners build models of human decisions and judgments, to which AI models are aligned. However…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Persona-Augmented Benchmarking: Evaluating LLMs Across Diverse Writing Styles

EMNLP 2025

Current benchmarks for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) often do not exhibit enough writing style diversity, with many adhering primarily to standardized conventions. Such benchmarks do not fully capture the rich variety of communication patterns exhibited by humans. Thus, it is possible that

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2023

Local Justice and Machine Learning: Modeling and Inferring Dynamic Ethical Preferences toward Allocations

AAAI 2023technical

We consider a setting in which a social planner has to make a sequence of decisions to allocate scarce resources in a high-stakes domain. Our goal is to understand stakeholders' dynamic moral preferences toward such allocational policies. In particular, we evaluate the sensitivity of moral preferenc…

Cited by 1SourcePDFScholar
2022

Allocating Opportunities in a Dynamic Model of Intergenerational Mobility (Extended Abstract)

IJCAI 2022poster

Opportunities such as higher education can promote intergenerational mobility, leading individuals to achieve levels of socioeconomic status above that of their parents. In this work, which is an extended abstract of a longer paper in the proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountab…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2022

Bayesian Persuasion for Algorithmic Recourse

NeurIPS 2022accept

When subjected to automated decision-making, decision subjects may strategically modify their observable features in ways they believe will maximize their chances of receiving a favorable decision. In many practical situations, the underlying assessment rule is deliberately kept secret to avoid gami…

Cited by 18SourcePDFScholar
2022

Strategic Instrumental Variable Regression: Recovering Causal Relationships From Strategic Responses

ICML 2022spotlight

In settings where Machine Learning (ML) algorithms automate or inform consequential decisions about people, individual decision subjects are often incentivized to strategically modify their observable attributes to receive more favorable predictions. As a result, the distribution the assessment rule…

2021

Addressing the Long-term Impact of ML Decisions via Policy Regret

IJCAI 2021poster

Machine Learning (ML) increasingly informs the allocation of opportunities to individuals and communities in areas such as lending, education, employment, and beyond. Such decisions often impact their subjects' future characteristics and capabilities in an a priori unknown fashion. The decision-make…

2019

On the Long-term Impact of Algorithmic Decision Policies: Effort Unfairness and Feature Segregation through Social Learning

ICML 2019oral

Most existing notions of algorithmic fairness are one-shot: they ensure some form of allocative equality at the time of decision making, but do not account for the adverse impact of the algorithmic decisions today on the long-term welfare and prosperity of certain segments of the population. We take…

2018

Fairness Behind a Veil of Ignorance: A Welfare Analysis for Automated Decision Making

NeurIPS 2018poster

We draw attention to an important, yet largely overlooked aspect of evaluating fairness for automated decision making systems---namely risk and welfare considerations. Our proposed family of measures corresponds to the long-established formulations of cardinal social welfare in economics, and is jus…