← Search

Johannes Kiesel

4 accepted papers

2024

The Touché23-ValueEval Dataset for Identifying Human Values behind Arguments

COLING 2024main

While human values play a crucial role in making arguments persuasive, we currently lack the necessary extensive datasets to develop methods for analyzing the values underlying these arguments on a large scale. To address this gap, we present the Touché23-ValueEval dataset, an expansion of the Webis…

2023

Unveiling the Power of Argument Arrangement in Online Persuasive Discussions

EMNLP 2023long findings

Previous research on argumentation in online discussions has largely focused on examining individual comments and neglected the interactive nature of discussions. In line with previous work, we represent individual comments as sequences of semantic argumentative unit types. However, because it is in…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2022

Identifying the Human Values behind Arguments

ACL 2022long

This paper studies the (often implicit) human values behind natural language arguments, such as to have freedom of thought or to be broadminded. Values are commonly accepted answers to why some option is desirable in the ethical sense and are thus essential both in real-world argumentation and theor…

2020

News Editorials: Towards Summarizing Long Argumentative Texts

COLING 2020main

The automatic summarization of argumentative texts has hardly been explored. This paper takes a further step in this direction, targeting news editorials, i.e., opinionated articles with a well-defined argumentation structure. With Webis-EditorialSum-2020, we present a corpus of 1330 carefully curat…

Cited by 19SourcePDFScholar