Julia Romberg — accepted AI-conference papers

2025

Towards a Perspectivist Turn in Argument Quality Assessment

Julia Romberg, Maximilian Maurer, Henning Wachsmuth, Gabriella Lapesa

NAACL 2025long

The assessment of argument quality depends on well-established logical, rhetorical, and dialectical properties that are unavoidably subjective: multiple valid assessments may exist, there is no unequivocal ground truth. This aligns with recent paths in machine learning, which embrace the co-existenc…

Cited by 0 Source ↗PDF ↗code ↗Scholar ↗

2023

Architectural Sweet Spots for Modeling Human Label Variation by the Example of Argument Quality: It’s Best to Relate Perspectives!

Philipp Heinisch, Matthias Orlikowski, Julia Romberg, Philipp Cimiano

EMNLP 2023long main

Many annotation tasks in natural language processing are highly subjective in that there can be different valid and justified perspectives on what is a proper label for a given example. This also applies to the judgment of argument quality, where the assignment of a single ground truth is often ques…

Cited by 13 Source ↗code ↗Scholar ↗