← Search

Pritish Kamath

25 accepted papers

2025

Balls-and-Bins Sampling for DP-SGD

AISTATS 2025oral

We introduce the _Balls-and-Bins_ sampling for differentially private (DP) optimization methods such as DP-SGD. While it has been common practice to use some form of shuffling in DP-SGD implementations, privacy accounting algorithms have typically assumed that Poisson subsampling is used instead. Re…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Private Hyperparameter Tuning with Ex-Post Guarantee

NeurIPS 2025spotlight

The conventional approach in differential privacy (DP) literature formulates the privacy-utility tradeoff with a "privacy-first" perspective: for a predetermined level of privacy, a certain utility is achievable. However, practitioners often operate under a "utility-first" paradigm, prioritizing a…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Scaling Embedding Layers in Language Models

NeurIPS 2025poster

We propose SCONE (**S**calable, **C**ontextualized, **O**ffloaded, **N**-gram **E**mbedding), a new method for extending input embedding layers to enhance language model performance. To avoid increased decoding costs, SCONE retains the original vocabulary while introducing embeddings for a set of fr…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Unlearn and Burn: Adversarial Machine Unlearning Requests Destroy Model Accuracy

ICLR 2025poster

Machine unlearning algorithms, designed for selective removal of training data from models, have emerged as a promising approach to growing privacy concerns. In this work, we expose a critical yet underexplored vulnerability in the deployment of unlearning systems: the assumption that the data reque…

Cited by 1SourcePDFScholar
2024

Differentially Private Optimization with Sparse Gradients

NeurIPS 2024poster

Motivated by applications of large embedding models, we study differentially private (DP) optimization problems under sparsity of _individual_ gradients. We start with new near-optimal bounds for the classic mean estimation problem but with sparse data, improving upon existing algorithms particula…

Cited by 5SourcePDFScholar
2024

How Private are DP-SGD Implementations?

ICML 2024oral

We demonstrate a substantial gap between the privacy guarantees of the Adaptive Batch Linear Queries (ABLQ) mechanism under different types of batch sampling: (i) Shuffling, and (ii) Poisson subsampling; the typical analysis of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) follows by i…

Cited by 16SourcePDFScholar
2024

Individualized Privacy Accounting via Subsampling with Applications in Combinatorial Optimization

ICML 2024poster

In this work, we give a new technique for analyzing individualized privacy accounting via the following simple observation: if an algorithm is one-sided add-DP, then its subsampled variant satisfies two-sided DP. From this, we obtain several improved algorithms for private combinatorial optimization…

Cited by 1SourcePDFScholar
2024

LabelDP-Pro: Learning with Label Differential Privacy via Projections

ICLR 2024poster

Label differentially private (label DP) algorithms seek to preserve the privacy of the labels in a training dataset in settings where the features are known to the adversary. In this work, we study a new family of label DP training algorithms. Unlike most prior label DP algorithms that have been bas…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2024

Scalable DP-SGD: Shuffling vs. Poisson Subsampling

NeurIPS 2024poster

We provide new lower bounds on the privacy guarantee of _multi-epoch_ Adaptive Batch Linear Queries (ABLQ) mechanism with _shuffled batch sampling_, demonstrating substantial gaps when compared to _Poisson subsampling_; prior analysis was limited to a single epoch. Since the privacy analysis of Diff…

Cited by 7SourcePDFScholar
2023

On Computing Pairwise Statistics with Local Differential Privacy

NeurIPS 2023poster

We study the problem of computing pairwise statistics, i.e., ones of the form $\binom{n}{2}^{-1} \sum_{i \ne j} f(x_i, x_j)$, where $x_i$ denotes the input to the $i$th user, with differential privacy (DP) in the local model. This formulation captures important metrics such as Kendall's $\tau$ coeff…

Cited by 3SourcePDFScholar
2023

On User-Level Private Convex Optimization

ICML 2023poster

We introduce a new mechanism for stochastic convex optimization (SCO) with user-level differential privacy guarantees. The convergence rates of this mechanism are similar to those in the prior work of Levy et al. 2021 and Narayanan et al. 2022, but with two important improvements. Our mechanism does…

Cited by 14SourcePDFScholar
2023

Optimal Unbiased Randomizers for Regression with Label Differential Privacy

NeurIPS 2023poster

We propose a new family of label randomizers for training _regression_ models under the constraint of label differential privacy (DP). In particular, we leverage the trade-offs between bias and variance to construct better label randomizers depending on a privately estimated prior distribution over…

Cited by 4SourcePDFScholar
2023

Regression with Label Differential Privacy

ICLR 2023poster

We study the task of training regression models with the guarantee of _label_ differential privacy (DP). Based on a global prior distribution of label values, which could be obtained privately, we derive a label DP randomization mechanism that is optimal under a given regression loss function. We pr…

Cited by 17SourcePDFScholar
2023

Sparsity-Preserving Differentially Private Training of Large Embedding Models

NeurIPS 2023poster

As the use of large embedding models in recommendation systems and language applications increases, concerns over user data privacy have also risen. DP-SGD, a training algorithm that combines differential privacy with stochastic gradient descent, has been the workhorse in protecting user privacy wi…

Cited by 5SourcePDFScholar
2023

User-Level Differential Privacy With Few Examples Per User

NeurIPS 2023oral

Previous work on user-level differential privacy (DP) [Ghazi et al. NeurIPS 2021, Bun et al. STOC 2023] obtained generic algorithms that work for various learning tasks. However, their focus was on the *example-rich* regime, where the users have so many examples that each user could themselves solve…

Cited by 17SourcePDFScholar
2022

Do More Negative Samples Necessarily Hurt In Contrastive Learning?

ICML 2022oral

Recent investigations in noise contrastive estimation suggest, both empirically as well as theoretically, that while having more “negative samples” in the contrastive loss improves downstream classification performance initially, beyond a threshold, it hurts downstream performance due to a “collisio…

Cited by 49SourcePDFScholar
2022

Faster Privacy Accounting via Evolving Discretization

ICML 2022spotlight

We introduce a new algorithm for numerical composition of privacy random variables, useful for computing the accurate differential privacy parameters for compositions of mechanisms. Our algorithm achieves a running time and memory usage of $polylog(k)$ for the task of self-composing a mechanism, fro…

2021

Does Invariant Risk Minimization Capture Invariance?

AISTATS 2021poster

We show that the Invariant Risk Minimization (IRM) formulation of Arjovsky et al. (2019) can fail to capture "natural" invariances, at least when used in its practical "linear" form, and even on very simple problems which directly follow the motivating examples for IRM. This can lead to worse genera…

Cited by 153SourcePDFScholar
2021

On the Power of Differentiable Learning versus PAC and SQ Learning

NeurIPS 2021spotlight

We study the power of learning via mini-batch stochastic gradient descent (SGD) on the loss of a differentiable model or neural network, and ask what learning problems can be learnt using this paradigm. We show that SGD can always simulate learning with statistical queries (SQ), but its ability to g…

Cited by 22SourcePDFScholar
2021

Quantifying the Benefit of Using Differentiable Learning over Tangent Kernels

ICML 2021spotlight

We study the relative power of learning with gradient descent on differentiable models, such as neural networks, versus using the corresponding tangent kernels. We show that under certain conditions, gradient descent achieves small error only if a related tangent kernel method achieves a non-trivial…

Cited by 53SourcePDFScholar
2018

Bayesian Inference of Temporal Task Specifications from Demonstrations

NeurIPS 2018poster

When observing task demonstrations, human apprentices are able to identify whether a given task is executed correctly long before they gain expertise in actually performing that task. Prior research into learning from demonstrations (LfD) has failed to capture this notion of the acceptability of an…

Cited by 106SourcePDFScholar