5 accepted papers
Multi-agent LLM debates are increasingly deployed in domains such as policy analysis and city planning, where no objective ground truth exists. Despite this, debate quality is typically evaluated using outcome-based proxies such as LLM-as-judge scores that provide little insight into whether meaning…
Epidemic modeling is essential for public health planning, yet traditional approaches rely on fixed model classes that require manual redesign as pathogens, policies, and scenario assumptions evolve. We introduce EpiAgent, an agentic framework that automatically synthesizes, calibrates, verifies, an…
Evaluating language models fairly is becoming harder as static benchmarks available on the internet risk contamination by training data. This makes it unclear whether models are truly reasoning or just recalling answers. In this paper, we introduce $\textbf{BeyondBench}$, an evaluation framework tha…
Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems have shown remarkable performance in tasks such as reasoning, planning, and decision-making. However, their applicability is limited by challenges such as high computational costs and robustness issues. In this work, we identify and systematically evalu…
Argument Quality Detection is an emerging field in NLP which has seen significant recent development. However, existing datasets in this field suffer from a lack of quality, quantity and diversity of topics and arguments, specifically the presence of vague arguments that are not persuasive in nature…