5 accepted papers
In reinforcement learning, human preference feedback is emerging as a viable alternative to expert-designed reward functions, which can be difficult to engineer in real-world problems. However, despite the growing importance of preference feedback, how to effectively *elicit* preferences remains a f…
Mainstream research in theoretical RL is currently focused on designing online learning algorithms with regret bounds that match the corresponding regret lower bound up to multiplicative constants (and, sometimes, logarithmic terms). In this position paper, we constructively question this trend, arg…
In the standard Reinforcement Learning (RL) paradigm, the action space is assumed to be fixed and immutable throughout the learning process. However, in many real-world scenarios, not all actions are available at every decision stage. The available action set may depend on the current environment st…
The success of sequential decision-making approaches, such as *reinforcement learning* (RL), is closely tied to the availability of a reward feedback. However, designing a reward function that encodes the desired objective is a challenging task. In this work, we address a more realistic scenario: se…
In several real-world sequential decision problems, at every step, the learner is required to select different actions. Every action affects a specific part of the system and generates an observable intermediate effect. In this paper, we introduce the Factored-Reward Bandits (FRBs), a novel setting…