← Search

Tirthankar Ghosal

5 accepted papers

2025

Can Large Language Models Unlock Novel Scientific Research Ideas?

EMNLP 2025

The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) and publicly available ChatGPT have marked a significant turning point in the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into people’s everyday lives. This study explores the capability of LLMs in generating novel research ideas based on infor

2025

MixRevDetect: Towards Detecting AI-Generated Content in Hybrid Peer Reviews.

NAACL 2025short

The growing use of large language models (LLMs) in academic peer review poses significant challenges, particularly in distinguishing AI-generated content from human-written feedback. This research addresses the problem of identifying AI-generated peer review comments, which are crucial to maintainin…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2024

Longform Multimodal Lay Summarization of Scientific Papers: Towards Automatically Generating Science Blogs from Research Articles

COLING 2024main

Science communication, in layperson’s terms, is essential to reach the general population and also maximize the impact of underlying scientific research. Hence, good science blogs and journalistic reviews of research articles are so well-read and critical to conveying science. Scientific blogging go…

2024

‘Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?’ Who will watch the watchmen? On Detecting AI-generated peer-reviews

EMNLP 2024main

The integrity of the peer-review process is vital for maintaining scientific rigor and trust within the academic community. With the steady increase in the usage of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT in academic writing, there is a growing concern that AI-generated texts could compromise the…

2023

When Reviewers Lock Horns: Finding Disagreements in Scientific Peer Reviews

EMNLP 2023short main

To this date, the efficacy of the scientific publishing enterprise fundamentally rests on the strength of the peer review process. The journal editor or the conference chair primarily relies on the expert reviewers' assessment, $\textit{identify points of agreement and disagreement}$ and try to reac…

Cited by 0SourceScholar