← Search

Łukasz Janeczko

11 accepted papers

2026

Identifying Imperfect Clones in Elections

AAAI 2026technical

A perfect clone in an ordinal election (i.e., an election where the voters rank the candidates in a strict linear order) is a set of candidates that each voter ranks consecutively. We consider different relaxations of this notion: *independent* or *subelection clones* are sets of candidates that on

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

Participatory Budgeting Project Strength via Candidate Control

IJCAI 2025

We study the complexity of candidate control in participatory budgeting elections. The goal of constructive candidate control is to ensure that a given candidate wins by either adding or deleting candidates from the election (in the destructive setting, the goal is to prevent a given candidate from

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

Strategic Cost Selection in Participatory Budgeting

NeurIPS 2025poster

We study strategic behavior of project proposers in the context of approval-based participatory budgeting (PB). In our model we assume that the votes are fixed and known and the proposers want to set as high project prices as possible, provided that their projects get selected and the prices are not…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

The Cost Perspective of Liquid Democracy: Feasibility and Control

AAAI 2025technical

We examine an approval-based model of Liquid Democracy with a budget constraint on voting and delegating costs, aiming to centrally select casting voters ensuring complete representation of the electorate. From a computational complexity perspective, we focus on minimizing overall costs, maintaining…

Cited by 1SourcePDFScholar
2024

Evaluation of Project Performance in Participatory Budgeting

IJCAI 2024poster

We study ways of evaluating the performance of losing projects in participatory budgeting (PB) elections by seeking actions that would make them win. We focus on lowering their costs, obtaining additional approvals, and removing approvals for competing projects: The larger a change is needed, the l…

Cited by 4SourcePDFScholar
2024

Guide to Numerical Experiments on Elections in Computational Social Choice

IJCAI 2024poster

We analyze how numerical experiments regarding elections were conducted within computational social choice literature (focusing on papers published in the IJCAI, AAAI, and AAMAS conferences). We analyze the sizes of the studied elections and the methods of generating preference data, thereby making…

2024

Selecting the Most Conflicting Pair of Candidates

IJCAI 2024poster

We study committee elections from a perspective of finding the most conflicting candidates, that is, candidates that imply the largest amount of conflict, as per voter preferences. By proposing basic axioms to capture this objective, we show that none of the prominent multiwinner voting rules meet t…

2023

Properties of Position Matrices and Their Elections

AAAI 2023technical

We study the properties of elections that have a given position matrix (in such elections each candidate is ranked on each position by a number of voters specified in the matrix). We show that counting elections that generate a given position matrix is #P-complete. Consequently, sampling such elect…

2022

How to Sample Approval Elections?

IJCAI 2022poster

We extend the map-of-elections framework to the case of approval elections. While doing so, we study a number of statistical cultures, including some new ones, and we analyze their properties. We find that approval elections can be understood in terms of the average number of approvals in the votes,…

Cited by 23SourcePDFScholar