← Search

Alicia Parrish

9 accepted papers

2026

Decoding Safety Feedback from Diverse Raters: A Data-driven Lens on Responsiveness to Severity

ICML 2026poster

Ensuring the safety of Generative AI requires a nuanced understanding of pluralistic viewpoints. In this paper, we introduce a novel data-driven approach for analyzing ordinal safety ratings in pluralistic settings. Specifically, we address the challenge of interpreting nuanced differences in safety…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Risk Management for Mitigating Benchmark Failure Modes: BenchRisk

NeurIPS 2025poster

Large language model (LLM) benchmarks inform LLM use decisions (e.g., "is this LLM safe to deploy for my use case and context?"). However, benchmarks may be rendered unreliable by various failure modes impacting benchmark bias, variance, coverage, or people's capacity to understand benchmark evidenc…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Whose View of Safety? A Deep DIVE Dataset for Pluralistic Alignment of Text-to-Image Models

NeurIPS 2025spotlight

Current text-to-image (T2I) models often fail to account for diverse human experiences, leading to misaligned systems. We advocate for pluralism in AI alignment, where an AI understands and is steerable towards diverse, and often conflicting, human values. Our work provides three core contributions…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2024

GRASP: A Disagreement Analysis Framework to Assess Group Associations in Perspectives

NAACL 2024long

Human annotation plays a core role in machine learning — annotations for supervised models, safety guardrails for generative models, and human feedback for reinforcement learning, to cite a few avenues. However, the fact that many of these human annotations are inherently subjective is often overloo…

2023

DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Development

NeurIPS 2023poster

Machine learning research has long focused on models rather than datasets, and prominent datasets are used for common ML tasks without regard to the breadth, difficulty, and faithfulness of the underlying problems. Neglecting the fundamental importance of data has given rise to inaccuracy, bias, and…

2023

What Do NLP Researchers Believe? Results of the NLP Community Metasurvey

ACL 2023long

We present the results of the NLP Community Metasurvey. Run from May to June 2022, it elicited opinions on controversial issues, including industry influence in the field, concerns about AGI, and ethics. Our results put concrete numbers to several controversies: For example, respondents are split in…

Cited by 39SourcePDFScholar
2022

BBQ: A hand-built bias benchmark for question answering

ACL 2022findings

It is well documented that NLP models learn social biases, but little work has been done on how these biases manifest in model outputs for applied tasks like question answering (QA). We introduce the Bias Benchmark for QA (BBQ), a dataset of question-sets constructed by the authors that highlight at…

2022

QuALITY: Question Answering with Long Input Texts, Yes!

NAACL 2022long

To enable building and testing models on long-document comprehension, we introduce QuALITY, a multiple-choice QA dataset with context passages in English that have an average length of about 5,000 tokens, much longer than typical current models can process. Unlike in prior work with passages, our qu…

2021

Does Putting a Linguist in the Loop Improve NLU Data Collection?

EMNLP 2021finding

Many crowdsourced NLP datasets contain systematic artifacts that are identified only after data collection is complete. Earlier identification of these issues should make it easier to create high-quality training and evaluation data. We attempt this by evaluating protocols in which expert linguists…

Cited by 46SourcePDFScholar