← Search

Ari Holtzman

27 accepted papers

2026

Mapping Overlaps in Benchmarks through Perplexity in the Wild

ICLR 2026poster

We construct benchmark signatures that capture the capacity required for strong performance to characterize large language model (LLM) benchmarks and their meaningful overlaps. Formally, we define them as sets of salient tokens drawn from **in-the-wild** corpora whose LLM token perplexity, reflectin…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2026

Multiple Streams of Knowledge Retrieval: Enriching and Recalling in Transformers

ICLR 2026poster

When an LLM learns a new fact during finetuning (e.g., new movie releases, updated celebrity gossip, etc.), where does this information go? Are entities enriched with relation information, or do models recall information just-in-time before a prediction? Are ``all of the above'' true with LLMs imple…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2025

Absence Bench: Language Models Can’t See What’s Missing

NeurIPS 2025spotlight

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable of processing long inputs and locating specific information within them, as evidenced by their performance on the Needle in a Haystack (NIAH) test. However, while models excel at recalling surprising information, they still struggle to identify c…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Byte Latent Transformer: Patches Scale Better Than Tokens

ACL 2025long

We introduce the Byte Latent Transformer (BLT), a new byte-level LLM architecture that, for the first time, matches tokenization-based LLM performance at scale with significant improvements in inference efficiency and robustness. BLT encodes bytes into dynamically sized patches, which serve as the p…

2025

MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Models

ICLR 2025poster

Language models (LMs) are trained on vast amounts of text data, which may include private and copyrighted content. Data owners may request the removal of their data from a trained model due to privacy or copyright concerns. However, exactly unlearning only these datapoints (i.e., retraining with the…

Cited by 52SourcePDFScholar
2025

Prompting as Scientific Inquiry

NeurIPS 2025poster

Prompting is the primary method by which we study and control large language models. It is also one of the most powerful: nearly every major capability attributed to LLMs—few-shot learning, chain-of-thought, constitutional AI—was first unlocked through prompting. Yet prompting is rarely treated as s…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2024

Nearest Neighbor Speculative Decoding for LLM Generation and Attribution

NeurIPS 2024poster

Large language models (LLMs) often hallucinate and lack the ability to provide attribution for their generations. Semi-parametric LMs, such as kNN-LM, approach these limitations by refining the output of an LM for a given prompt using its nearest neighbor matches in a non-parametric data store. Howe…

2024

Superposed Decoding: Multiple Generations from a Single Autoregressive Inference Pass

NeurIPS 2024poster

Many applications today provide users with multiple auto-complete drafts as they type, including GitHub's code completion, Gmail's smart compose, and Apple's messaging auto-suggestions. Under the hood, language models support this by running an autoregressive inference pass to provide a draft. Conse…

2023

Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimization

ACL 2023long

Given a language model (LM), maximum probability is a poor decoding objective for open-ended generation, because it produces short and repetitive text. On the other hand, sampling can often produce incoherent text that drifts from the original topics. We propose contrastive decoding (CD), a reliable…

2023

Toward Human Readable Prompt Tuning: Kubrick’s The Shining is a good movie, and a good prompt too?

EMNLP 2023long findings

Large language models can perform downstream tasks in a zero-shot fashion, given natural language prompts that specify the desired behavior. Such prompts are typically hand engineered, but can also be learned with gradient-based methods from labeled data. However, it is underexplored what factors ma…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2023

What Do NLP Researchers Believe? Results of the NLP Community Metasurvey

ACL 2023long

We present the results of the NLP Community Metasurvey. Run from May to June 2022, it elicited opinions on controversial issues, including industry influence in the field, concerns about AGI, and ethics. Our results put concrete numbers to several controversies: For example, respondents are split in…

Cited by 39SourcePDFScholar
2022

DEMix Layers: Disentangling Domains for Modular Language Modeling

NAACL 2022long

We introduce a new domain expert mixture (DEMix) layer that enables conditioning a language model (LM) on the domain of the input text. A DEMix layer includes a collection of expert feedforward networks, each specialized to a domain, that makes the LM modular: experts can be mixed, added, or removed…

2022

Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?

EMNLP 2022main

Large language models (LMs) are able to in-context learn—perform a new task via inference alone by conditioning on a few input-label pairs (demonstrations) and making predictions for new inputs. However, there has been little understanding of how the model learns and which aspects of the demonstrati…

2021

CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning

EMNLP 2021main

Image captioning has conventionally relied on reference-based automatic evaluations, where machine captions are compared against captions written by humans. This is in contrast to the reference-free manner in which humans assess caption quality. In this paper, we report the surprising empirical find…

2021

MultiTalk: A Highly-Branching Dialog Testbed for Diverse Conversations

AAAI 2021technical

We study conversational dialog in which there are many possible responses to a given history. We present the MultiTalk Dataset, a corpus of over 320,000 sentences of written conversational dialog that balances a high branching factor (10) with several conversation turns (6) through selective branch…

Cited by 11SourcePDFScholar
2021

PIGLeT: Language Grounding Through Neuro-Symbolic Interaction in a 3D World

ACL 2021long

We propose PIGLeT: a model that learns physical commonsense knowledge through interaction, and then uses this knowledge to ground language. We factorize PIGLeT into a physical dynamics model, and a separate language model. Our dynamics model learns not just what objects are but also what they do: gl…

Cited by 81SourcePDFScholar
2021

Reflective Decoding: Beyond Unidirectional Generation with Off-the-Shelf Language Models

ACL 2021long

Publicly available, large pretrained Language Models (LMs) generate text with remarkable quality, but only sequentially from left to right. As a result, they are not immediately applicable to generation tasks that break the unidirectional assumption, such as paraphrasing or text-infilling, necessita…

2021

Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn’t Always Right

EMNLP 2021main

Large language models have shown promising results in zero-shot settings. For example, they can perform multiple choice tasks simply by conditioning on a question and selecting the answer with the highest probability. However, ranking by string probability can be problematic due to surface form comp…

2021

TuringAdvice: A Generative and Dynamic Evaluation of Language Use

NAACL 2021long

We propose TuringAdvice, a new challenge task and dataset for language understanding models. Given a written situation that a real person is currently facing, a model must generate helpful advice in natural language. Our evaluation framework tests a fundamental aspect of human language understanding…

Cited by 33SourcePDFScholar
2020

Abductive Commonsense Reasoning

ICLR 2020poster

Abductive reasoning is inference to the most plausible explanation. For example, if Jenny finds her house in a mess when she returns from work, and remembers that she left a window open, she can hypothesize that a thief broke into her house and caused the mess, as the most plausible explanat…

Cited by 468SourceScholar
2019

Defending Against Neural Fake News

NeurIPS 2019poster

Recent progress in natural language generation has raised dual-use concerns. While applications like summarization and translation are positive, the underlying technology also might enable adversaries to generate neural fake news: targeted propaganda that closely mimics the style of real news.

2019

Tactical Rewind: Self-Correction via Backtracking in Vision-And-Language Navigation

CVPR 2019oral

We present the Frontier Aware Search with backTracking (FAST) Navigator, a general framework for action decoding, that achieves state-of-the-art results on the 2018 Room-to-Room (R2R) Vision-and-Language navigation challenge. Given a natural language instruction and photo-realistic image views of a…

Cited by 194PDFcodeScholar
2018

Simulating Action Dynamics with Neural Process Networks

ICLR 2018poster

Understanding procedural language requires anticipating the causal effects of actions, even when they are not explicitly stated. In this work, we introduce Neural Process Networks to understand procedural text through (neural) simulation of action dynamics. Our model complements existing memory ar…

Cited by 143SourcePDFScholar