← Search

Matthew Peters

17 accepted papers

2024

Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Research

ACL 2024long

Information about pretraining corpora used to train the current best-performing language models is seldom discussed: commercial models rarely detail their data, and even open models are often released without accompanying training data or recipes to reproduce them. As a result, it is challenging to…

2024

OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Models

ACL 2024long

Language models (LMs) have become ubiquitous in both NLP research and in commercial product offerings. As their commercial importance has surged, the most powerful models have become closed off, gated behind proprietary interfaces, with important details of their training data, architectures, and de…

2023

FiD-ICL: A Fusion-in-Decoder Approach for Efficient In-Context Learning

ACL 2023long

Large pre-trained models are capable of few-shot in-context learning (ICL), i.e., performing a new task by prepending a few demonstrations before the test input. However, the concatenated demonstrations are often excessively long and induce additional computation. Inspired by fusion-in-decoder (FiD)…

2023

HINT: Hypernetwork Instruction Tuning for Efficient Zero- and Few-Shot Generalisation

ACL 2023long

Recent NLP models have shown the remarkable ability to effectively generalise ‘zero-shot’ to new tasks using only natural language instructions as guidance. However, many of these approaches suffer from high computational costs due to their reliance on concatenating lengthy instructions with every i…

2023

Peek Across: Improving Multi-Document Modeling via Cross-Document Question-Answering

ACL 2023long

The integration of multi-document pre-training objectives into language models has resulted in remarkable improvements in multi-document downstream tasks. In this work, we propose extending this idea by pre-training a generic multi-document model from a novel cross-document question answering pre-tr…

2022

ATTEMPT: Parameter-Efficient Multi-task Tuning via Attentional Mixtures of Soft Prompts

EMNLP 2022main

This work introduces a new multi-task, parameter-efficient language model (LM) tuning method that learns to transfer knowledge across different tasks via a mixture of soft prompts—small prefix embedding vectors pre-trained for different tasks. Our method, called ATTEMPT (ATTEntional Mixtures of Prom…

2022

Does Self-Rationalization Improve Robustness to Spurious Correlations?

EMNLP 2022main

Rationalization is fundamental to human reasoning and learning. NLP models trained to produce rationales along with predictions, called self-rationalization models, have been investigated for their interpretability and utility to end-users. However, the extent to which training with human-written ra…

Cited by 15SourcePDFScholar
2022

Efficient Hierarchical Domain Adaptation for Pretrained Language Models

NAACL 2022long

The remarkable success of large language models has been driven by dense models trained on massive unlabeled, unstructured corpora. These corpora typically contain text from diverse, heterogeneous sources, but information about the source of the text is rarely used during training. Transferring thei…

2022

Extracting Latent Steering Vectors from Pretrained Language Models

ACL 2022findings

Prior work on controllable text generation has focused on learning how to control language models through trainable decoding, smart-prompt design, or fine-tuning based on a desired objective. We hypothesize that the information needed to steer the model to generate a target sentence is already encod…

2022

Few-Shot Self-Rationalization with Natural Language Prompts

NAACL 2022findings

Self-rationalization models that predict task labels and generate free-text elaborations for their predictions could enable more intuitive interaction with NLP systems. These models are, however, currently trained with a large amount of human-written free-text explanations for each task which hinder…

2022

Staged Training for Transformer Language Models

ICML 2022spotlight

The current standard approach to scaling transformer language models trains each model size from a different random initialization. As an alternative, we consider a staged training setup that begins with a small model and incrementally increases the amount of compute used for training by applying a…

2022

Tailor: Generating and Perturbing Text with Semantic Controls

ACL 2022long

Controlled text perturbation is useful for evaluating and improving model generalizability. However, current techniques rely on training a model for every target perturbation, which is expensive and hard to generalize. We present Tailor, a semantically-controlled text generation system. Tailor build…

2021

CDLM: Cross-Document Language Modeling

EMNLP 2021finding

We introduce a new pretraining approach geared for multi-document language modeling, incorporating two key ideas into the masked language modeling self-supervised objective. First, instead of considering documents in isolation, we pretrain over sets of multiple related documents, encouraging the mod…

2021

Competency Problems: On Finding and Removing Artifacts in Language Data

EMNLP 2021main

Much recent work in NLP has documented dataset artifacts, bias, and spurious correlations between input features and output labels. However, how to tell which features have “spurious” instead of legitimate correlations is typically left unspecified. In this work we argue that for complex language un…

Cited by 108SourcePDFScholar
2021

PIGLeT: Language Grounding Through Neuro-Symbolic Interaction in a 3D World

ACL 2021long

We propose PIGLeT: a model that learns physical commonsense knowledge through interaction, and then uses this knowledge to ground language. We factorize PIGLeT into a physical dynamics model, and a separate language model. Our dynamics model learns not just what objects are but also what they do: gl…

Cited by 81SourcePDFScholar
2020

Adversarial Filters of Dataset Biases

ICML 2020poster

Large neural models have demonstrated human-level performance on language and vision benchmarks, while their performance degrades considerably on adversarial or out-of-distribution samples. This raises the question of whether these models have learned to solve a dataset rather than the underlying ta…