← Search

Arno Blaas

10 accepted papers

2026

GenCtrl -- A Formal Controllability Toolkit for Generative Models

ICLR 2026poster

As generative models become ubiquitous, there is a critical need for fine-grained control over the generation process. Yet, while controlled generation methods from prompting to fine-tuning proliferate, a fundamental question remains unanswered: are these models truly controllable in the first place…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

SelfReflect: Can LLMs Communicate Their Internal Answer Distribution?

ICLR 2026poster

The common approach to communicate a large language model's (LLM) uncertainty is to add a percentage number or a hedging word to its response. But is this all we can do? Instead of generating a single answer and then hedging it, an LLM that is fully transparent to the user needs to be able to reflec…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2025

Controlling Language and Diffusion Models by Transporting Activations

ICLR 2025spotlight

The increasing capabilities of large generative models and their ever more widespread deployment have raised concerns about their reliability, safety, and potential misuse. To address these issues, recent works have proposed to control model generation by steering model activations in order to effec…

2025

LinEAS: End-to-end Learning of Activation Steering with a Distributional Loss

NeurIPS 2025poster

The growing use of generative models in daily life calls for efficient mechanisms to control their generation, to e.g. produce safe content or provide users with tools to explore style changes. Ideally, such mechanisms should require low volume of unpaired data (\ie without explicit preference), and…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Revisiting Uncertainty Quantification Evaluation in Language Models: Spurious Interactions with Response Length Bias Results

ACL 2025short

Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) in Language Models (LMs) is key to improving their safety and reliability. Evaluations often use metrics like AUROC to assess how well UQ methods (e.g., negative sequence probabilities) correlate with task correctness functions (e.g., ROUGE-L). We show that mutual bia…

2023

DUET: 2D Structured and Approximately Equivariant Representations

ICML 2023poster

Multiview Self-Supervised Learning (MSSL) is based on learning invariances with respect to a set of input transformations. However, invariance partially or totally removes transformation-related information from the representations, which might harm performance for specific downstream tasks that req…

2023

The Role of Entropy and Reconstruction in Multi-View Self-Supervised Learning

ICML 2023poster

The mechanisms behind the success of multi-view self-supervised learning (MVSSL) are not yet fully understood. Contrastive MVSSL methods have been studied through the lens of InfoNCE, a lower bound of the Mutual Information (MI). However, the relation between other MVSSL methods and MI remains uncle…

2021

Adversarial Attacks on Graph Classifiers via Bayesian Optimisation

NeurIPS 2021poster

Graph neural networks, a popular class of models effective in a wide range of graph-based learning tasks, have been shown to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks. While the majority of the literature focuses on such vulnerability in node-level classification tasks, little effort has been dedicated t…

2020

Adversarial Robustness Guarantees for Classification with Gaussian Processes

AISTATS 2020poster

We investigate adversarial robustness of Gaussian Process classification (GPC) models. Specifically, given a compact subset of the input space $T\subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ enclosing a test point $x^*$ and a GPC trained on a dataset $\mathcal{D}$, we aim to compute the minimum and the maximum classifica…