← Search

Cunxiang Wang

24 accepted papers

2026

Memoria-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Memory in Long-Horizon Autonomous Agents

ICML 2026poster

Memory is a core capability of autonomous agents, yet existing benchmarks evaluate it primarily in constrained settings such as short dialogues or synthetic tasks, failing to reflect realistic agent deployments. We present \textbf{Memoria-Bench}, a benchmark for evaluating agent memory grounded in c…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

Rethinking LLM Evaluation: Can We Evaluate LLMs with 200× Less Data?

ICLR 2026poster

As the demand for comprehensive evaluations of diverse model capabilities steadily increases, benchmark suites have correspondingly grown significantly in scale. Despite notable advances in redundancy reduction and subset-level performance prediction, a systematic framework that effectively integrat…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2026

Temporal Self-Rewarding Language Models: Decoupling Chosen-Rejected via Past-Future

ICML 2026poster

Self-Rewarding Language Models propose an architecture in which the Large Language Models(LLMs) both generates responses and evaluates its own outputs via LLM-as-a-Judge prompting, dynamically improving its generative capabilities through iterative Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). However, our …

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

TrustJudge: Inconsistencies of LLM-as-a-Judge and How to Alleviate Them

ICLR 2026poster

The adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) as automated evaluators (LLM-as-a-judge) has revealed critical inconsistencies in current evaluation frameworks. We identify two fundamental types of inconsistencies: (1) \textit{Score-Comparison Inconsistency}, where lower-rated responses outperform high…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2026

UDA: Unsupervised Debiasing Alignment for Pair-wise LLM-as-a-Judge

AAAI 2026technical

Pairwise evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) is a common paradigm, but it is prone to preference bias, where judges systematically favor certain outputs, such as their own. This bias leads to inconsistent and skewed rankings across different judges. To address this, we first empirically demon

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

CPRM: A LLM-based Continual Pre-training Framework for Relevance Modeling in Commercial Search

NAACL 2025industry

Relevance modeling between queries and items stands as a pivotal component in commercial search engines, directly affecting the user experience. Given the remarkable achievements of large language models (LLMs) in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, LLM-based relevance modeling is gradu…

2025

HPSS: Heuristic Prompting Strategy Search for LLM Evaluators

ACL 2025finding

Since the adoption of large language models (LLMs) for text evaluation has become increasingly prevalent in the field of natural language processing (NLP), a series of existing works attempt to optimize the prompts for LLM evaluators to improve their alignment with human judgment. However, their eff…

2025

How Likely Do LLMs with CoT Mimic Human Reasoning?

COLING 2025main

Chain-of-thought emerges as a promising technique for eliciting reasoning capabilities from Large Language Models (LLMs). However, it does not always improve task performance or accurately represent reasoning processes, leaving unresolved questions about its usage. In this paper, we diagnose the und…

2025

LongSafety: Evaluating Long-Context Safety of Large Language Models

ACL 2025long

As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance in understanding and generating long sequences, new safety concerns have been introduced through the long context. However, the safety of LLMs in long-context tasks remains under-explored, leaving a significant gap in both evaluation and improvemen…

2025

NovelQA: Benchmarking Question Answering on Documents Exceeding 200K Tokens

ICLR 2025poster

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have pushed the boundaries of natural language processing, especially in long-context understanding. However, the evaluation of these models' long-context abilities remains a challenge due to the limitations of current benchmarks. To address this g…

2025

SPaR: Self-Play with Tree-Search Refinement to Improve Instruction-Following in Large Language Models

ICLR 2025poster

Instruction-following is a fundamental capability of language models, requiring the model to recognize even the most subtle requirements in the instructions and accurately reflect them in its output. Such an ability is well-suited for and often optimized by preference learning. However, existing met…

2025

Self-DC: When to Reason and When to Act? Self Divide-and-Conquer for Compositional Unknown Questions

NAACL 2025long

Previous research has typically concentrated on leveraging the internal knowledge of Large Language Models (LLMs) to answer known questions (i.e., internal reasoning such as generate-then-read). In contrast, for questions that fall outside their known scope, these models rely on external knowledge r…

Cited by 6SourcePDFScholar
2025

Training Language Model to Critique for Better Refinement

ACL 2025finding

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable evaluation and critique capabilities, providing insightful feedback and identifying flaws in various tasks. However, limited research has explored which types of critiques are most effective for improving model responses or how to generate su…

2025

Unlocking Recursive Thinking of LLMs: Alignment via Refinement

ACL 2025finding

The OpenAI o1-series models have demonstrated that leveraging long-form Chain of Thought (CoT) can substantially enhance performance. However, the recursive thinking capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) remain limited, particularly in the absence of expert-curated data for distillation. In t…

2024

Knowledge Conflicts for LLMs: A Survey

EMNLP 2024main

This survey provides an in-depth analysis of knowledge conflicts for large language models (LLMs), highlighting the complex challenges they encounter when blending contextual and parametric knowledge. Our focus is on three categories of knowledge conflicts: context-memory, inter-context, and intra-m…

2024

Nash CoT: Multi-Path Inference with Preference Equilibrium

EMNLP 2024main

Chain of thought (CoT) is a reasoning framework that can enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs) on complex inference tasks. In particular, among various studies related to CoT, multi-path inference stands out as a simple yet effective improvement. However, there is no optimal settin…

2024

PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimization

ICLR 2024poster

Instruction tuning large language models (LLMs) remains a challenging task, owing to the complexity of hyperparameter selection and the difficulty involved in evaluating the tuned models. To determine the optimal hyperparameters, an automatic, robust, and reliable evaluation benchmark is essential.…

2024

RAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented Generation

NeurIPS 2024poster

Despite Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has shown promising capability in leveraging external knowledge, a comprehensive evaluation of RAG systems is still challenging due to the modular nature of RAG, evaluation of long-form responses and reliability of measurements. In this paper, we propose…

2024

SHIELD: Evaluation and Defense Strategies for Copyright Compliance in LLM Text Generation

EMNLP 2024main

Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed machine learning but raised significant legal concerns due to their potential to produce text that infringes on copyrights, resulting in several high-profile lawsuits. The legal landscape is struggling to keep pace with these rapid advancements, with ong…

2023

Evaluating Open-QA Evaluation

NeurIPS 2023poster

This study focuses on the evaluation of the Open Question Answering (Open-QA) task, which can directly estimate the factuality of large language models (LLMs). Current automatic evaluation methods have shown limitations, indicating that human evaluation still remains the most reliable approach. We i…

2023

Exploiting Abstract Meaning Representation for Open-Domain Question Answering

ACL 2023findings

The Open-Domain Question Answering (ODQA) task involves retrieving and subsequently generating answers from fine-grained relevant passages within a database. Current systems leverage Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) to model the relationship between questions and passages. However, the diversity in…

2023

RFiD: Towards Rational Fusion-in-Decoder for Open-Domain Question Answering

ACL 2023findings

Open-Domain Question Answering (ODQA) systems necessitate a reader model capable of generating answers by simultaneously referring to multiple passages. Although representative models like Fusion-in-Decoder (FiD) have been proposed to address this challenge, these systems can inadvertently rely on s…

2023

TRAMS: Training-free Memory Selection for Long-range Language Modeling

EMNLP 2023short findings

The Transformer architecture is crucial for numerous AI models, but it still faces challenges in long-range language modeling. Though several specific transformer architectures have been designed to tackle issues of long-range dependencies, existing methods like Transformer-XL are plagued by a high…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2021

Can Generative Pre-trained Language Models Serve As Knowledge Bases for Closed-book QA?

ACL 2021long

Recent work has investigated the interesting question using pre-trained language models (PLMs) as knowledge bases for answering open questions. However, existing work is limited in using small benchmarks with high test-train overlaps. We construct a new dataset of closed-book QA using SQuAD, and inv…