← Search

Debjit Paul

9 accepted papers

2026

A Benchmark for Deep Information Synthesis

ICLR 2026poster

Large language model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly used to solve complex tasks involving tool use, such as web browsing, code execution, and data analysis. However, current evaluation benchmarks do not adequately assess their ability to solve real-world tasks that require synthesizing informat…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

A Logical Fallacy-Informed Framework for Argument Generation

NAACL 2025long

Despite the remarkable performance of large language models (LLMs), they still struggle with generating logically sound arguments, resulting in potential risks such as spreading misinformation. An important factor contributing to LLMs’ suboptimal performance in generating coherent arguments is their…

2025

INCLUDE: Evaluating Multilingual Language Understanding with Regional Knowledge

ICLR 2025spotlight

The performance differential of large language models (LLM) between languages hinders their effective deployment in many regions, inhibiting the potential economic and societal value of generative AI tools in many communities. However, the development of functional LLMs in many languages (i.e., mult…

Cited by 9SourcePDFScholar
2024

Entity Insertion in Multilingual Linked Corpora: The Case of Wikipedia

EMNLP 2024main

Links are a fundamental part of information networks, turning isolated pieces of knowledge into a network of information that is much richer than the sum of its parts. However, adding a new link to the network is not trivial: it requires not only the identification of a suitable pair of source and t…

2024

Exploring Defeasibility in Causal Reasoning

ACL 2024findings

Defeasibility in causal reasoning implies that the causal relationship between cause and effect can be strengthened or weakened. Namely, the causal strength between cause and effect should increase or decrease with the incorporation of strengthening arguments (supporters) or weakening arguments (def…

Cited by 4SourcePDFScholar
2024

Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

EMNLP 2024finding

Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to perform better when asked to reason step-by-step before answering a question. However, it is unclear to what degree the model’s final answer is faithful to the stated reasoning steps. In this paper, we perform a causal mediation analysis on twelve LLMs…

Cited by 19SourcePDFScholar
2023

CRAB: Assessing the Strength of Causal Relationships Between Real-world Events

EMNLP 2023long main

Understanding narratives requires reasoning about the cause-and-effect relationships between events mentioned in the text. While existing foundation models yield impressive results in many NLP tasks requiring reasoning, it is unclear whether they understand the complexity of the underlying network o…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2023

CRoW: Benchmarking Commonsense Reasoning in Real-World Tasks

EMNLP 2023long main

Recent efforts in natural language processing (NLP) commonsense reasoning research have yielded a considerable number of new datasets and benchmarks. However, most of these datasets formulate commonsense reasoning challenges in artificial scenarios that are not reflective of the tasks which real-wor…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2021

COINS: Dynamically Generating COntextualized Inference Rules for Narrative Story Completion

ACL 2021long

Despite recent successes of large pre-trained language models in solving reasoning tasks, their inference capabilities remain opaque. We posit that such models can be made more interpretable by explicitly generating interim inference rules, and using them to guide the generation of task-specific tex…