← Search

Himabindu Lakkaraju

47 accepted papers

2026

Position: Explainability Research Must Prioritize Foundations over Ad-hoc Methods

ICML 2026poster

Despite the proliferation of Explainable AI (XAI) techniques—from feature attributions to sparse autoencoders—explanations rarely influence real-world workflows. In practice, they are often generated and discarded without guiding meaningful action. This gap reflects foundational shortcomings: resear…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

Temporal Sparse Autoencoders: Leveraging the Sequential Nature of Language for Interpretability

ICLR 2026oral

Translating the internal representations and computations of models into concepts that humans can understand is a key goal of interpretability. While recent dictionary learning methods such as Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) provide a promising route to discover human-interpretable features, they often o…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2026

Who Gets Credit or Blame? Attributing Accountability in Modern AI Systems

ICML 2026poster

Modern AI systems are typically developed through multiple stages-pretraining, fine-tuning rounds, and subsequent adaptation or alignment, where each stage builds on the previous ones and updates the model in distinct ways. This raises a critical question of accountability: when a deployed model suc…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

EvoLM: In Search of Lost Language Model Training Dynamics

NeurIPS 2025oral

Modern language model (LM) training has been divided into multiple stages, making it difficult for downstream developers to evaluate the impact of design choices made at each stage. We present EvoLM, a model suite that enables systematic and transparent analysis of LMs' training dynamics across pre-…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Follow My Instruction and Spill the Beans: Scalable Data Extraction from Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems

ICLR 2025poster

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves pre-trained models by incorporating external knowledge at test time to enable customized adaptation. We study the risk of datastore leakage in Retrieval-In-Context RAG Language Models (LMs). We show that an adversary can exploit LMs' instruction-followi…

2025

Inference-Time Reward Hacking in Large Language Models

NeurIPS 2025spotlight

A common paradigm to improve the performance of large language models is optimizing for a reward model. Reward models assign a numerical score to an LLM’s output that indicates, for example, how likely it is to align with user preferences or safety goals. However, reward models are never perfect. Th…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models

NeurIPS 2025poster

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have significantly enhanced their capabilities in complex problem-solving by introducing a thinking draft that enables multi-path Chain-of-Thought explorations before producing final answers. Ensuring the faithfulness of these intermediate reasoning processes is crucia…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

More RLHF, More Trust? On The Impact of Preference Alignment On Trustworthiness

ICLR 2025oral

The trustworthiness of Large Language Models (LLMs) refers to the extent to which their outputs are reliable, safe, and ethically aligned, and it has become a crucial consideration alongside their cognitive performance. In practice, Reinforcement Learning From Human Feedback (RLHF) has been widely u…

2025

Quantifying Generalization Complexity for Large Language Models

ICLR 2025poster

While large language models (LLMs) have shown exceptional capabilities in understanding complex queries and performing sophisticated tasks, their generalization abilities are often deeply entangled with memorization, necessitating more precise evaluation. To address this challenge, we introduce Scy…

2024

A Study on the Calibration of In-context Learning

NAACL 2024long

Accurate uncertainty quantification is crucial for the safe deployment of machine learning models, and prior research has demonstrated improvements in the calibration of modern language models (LMs). We study in-context learning (ICL), a prevalent method for adapting static LMs through tailored prom…

2024

Confronting LLMs with Traditional ML: Rethinking the Fairness of Large Language Models in Tabular Classifications

NAACL 2024long

Recent literature has suggested the potential of using large language models (LLMs) to make classifications for tabular tasks. However, LLMs have been shown to exhibit harmful social biases that reflect the stereotypes and inequalities present in society. To this end, as well as the widespread use o…

Cited by 12SourcePDFScholar
2024

Fair Machine Unlearning: Data Removal while Mitigating Disparities

AISTATS 2024poster

The Right to be Forgotten is a core principle outlined by regulatory frameworks such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This principle allows individuals to request that their personal data be deleted from deployed machine learning models. While "forgetting" can be naively achiev…

2024

In-Context Unlearning: Language Models as Few-Shot Unlearners

ICML 2024poster

Machine unlearning, the study of efficiently removing the impact of specific training instances on a model, has garnered increased attention in recent years due to regulatory guidelines such as the Right to be Forgotten. Achieving precise unlearning typically involves fully retraining the model and…

2024

Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)

NeurIPS 2024poster

CLIP embeddings have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of multimodal applications. However, these high-dimensional, dense vector representations are not easily interpretable, limiting our understanding of the rich structure of CLIP and its use in downstream applications that r…

2024

MedSafetyBench: Evaluating and Improving the Medical Safety of Large Language Models

NeurIPS 2024poster

As large language models (LLMs) develop increasingly sophisticated capabilities and find applications in medical settings, it becomes important to assess their medical safety due to their far-reaching implications for personal and public health, patient safety, and human rights. However, there is li…

2024

Quantifying Uncertainty in Natural Language Explanations of Large Language Models

AISTATS 2024poster

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as powerful tools for several high-stakes natural language processing (NLP) applications. Recent prompting works claim to elicit intermediate reasoning steps and key tokens that serve as proxy explanations for LLM predictions. However, there is no c…

2024

Understanding the Effects of Iterative Prompting on Truthfulness

ICML 2024poster

The development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has notably transformed numerous sectors, offering impressive text generation capabilities. Yet, the reliability and truthfulness of these models remain pressing concerns. To this end, we investigate iterative prompting, a strategy hypothesized to refi…

Cited by 10SourcePDFScholar
2023

$\mathcal{M}^4$: A Unified XAI Benchmark for Faithfulness Evaluation of Feature Attribution Methods across Metrics, Modalities and Models

NeurIPS 2023poster

While Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques have been widely studied to explain predictions made by deep neural networks, the way to evaluate the faithfulness of explanation results remains challenging, due to the heterogeneity of explanations for various models and the lack of ground…

2023

Discriminative Feature Attributions: Bridging Post Hoc Explainability and Inherent Interpretability

NeurIPS 2023poster

With the increased deployment of machine learning models in various real-world applications, researchers and practitioners alike have emphasized the need for explanations of model behaviour. To this end, two broad strategies have been outlined in prior literature to explain models. Post hoc explanat…

2023

On Minimizing the Impact of Dataset Shifts on Actionable Explanations

UAI 2023poster

The Right to Explanation is an important regulatory principle that allows individuals to request actionable explanations for algorithmic decisions. However, several technical challenges arise when providing such actionable explanations in practice. For instance, models are periodically retrained to…

Cited by 6SourcePDFScholar
2023

Post Hoc Explanations of Language Models Can Improve Language Models

NeurIPS 2023poster

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in performing complex tasks. Moreover, recent research has shown that incorporating human-annotated rationales (e.g., Chain-of-Thought prompting) during in-context learning can significantly enhance the performance of these model…

Cited by 72SourcePDFScholar
2023

Probabilistically Robust Recourse: Navigating the Trade-offs between Costs and Robustness in Algorithmic Recourse

ICLR 2023poster

As machine learning models are increasingly being employed to make consequential decisions in real-world settings, it becomes critical to ensure that individuals who are adversely impacted (e.g., loan denied) by the predictions of these models are provided with a means for recourse. While several ap…

2023

Towards Bridging the Gaps between the Right to Explanation and the Right to be Forgotten

ICML 2023poster

The Right to Explanation and the Right to be Forgotten are two important principles outlined to regulate algorithmic decision making and data usage in real-world applications. While the right to explanation allows individuals to request an actionable explanation for an algorithmic decision, the righ…

Cited by 15SourcePDFScholar
2023

Which Models have Perceptually-Aligned Gradients? An Explanation via Off-Manifold Robustness

NeurIPS 2023spotlight

One of the remarkable properties of robust computer vision models is that their input-gradients are often aligned with human perception, referred to in the literature as perceptually-aligned gradients (PAGs). Despite only being trained for classification, PAGs cause robust models to have rudimentary…

2022

Data poisoning attacks on off-policy policy evaluation methods

UAI 2022poster

Off-policy Evaluation (OPE) methods are a crucial tool for evaluating policies in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, where exploration is often infeasible, unethical, or expensive. However, the extent to which such methods can be trusted under adversarial threats to data quality is largely unex…

Cited by 2SourcePDFScholar
2022

Efficient Training of Low-Curvature Neural Networks

NeurIPS 2022accept

Standard deep neural networks often have excess non-linearity, making them susceptible to issues such as low adversarial robustness and gradient instability. Common methods to address these downstream issues, such as adversarial training, are expensive and often sacrifice predictive accuracy. In…

Cited by 25SourcePDFScholar
2022

Exploring Counterfactual Explanations Through the Lens of Adversarial Examples: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis

AISTATS 2022poster

As machine learning (ML) models becomemore widely deployed in high-stakes applications, counterfactual explanations have emerged as key tools for providing actionable model explanations in practice. Despite the growing popularity of counterfactual explanations, the theoretical understanding of these…

Cited by 76SourcePDFScholar
2022

OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanations

NeurIPS 2022accept

While several types of post hoc explanation methods have been proposed in recent literature, there is very little work on systematically benchmarking these methods. Here, we introduce OpenXAI, a comprehensive and extensible open-source framework for evaluating and benchmarking post hoc explanation m…

2022

Probing GNN Explainers: A Rigorous Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of GNN Explanation Methods

AISTATS 2022poster

As Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are increasingly being employed in critical real-world applications, several methods have been proposed in recent literature to explain the predictions of these models. However, there has been little to no work on systematically analyzing the reliability of these meth…

Cited by 77SourcePDFScholar
2022

Which Explanation Should I Choose? A Function Approximation Perspective to Characterizing Post Hoc Explanations

NeurIPS 2022accept

A critical problem in the field of post hoc explainability is the lack of a common foundational goal among methods. For example, some methods are motivated by function approximation, some by game theoretic notions, and some by obtaining clean visualizations. This fragmentation of goals causes not on…

2021

Counterfactual Explanations Can Be Manipulated

NeurIPS 2021poster

Counterfactual explanations are emerging as an attractive option for providing recourse to individuals adversely impacted by algorithmic decisions. As they are deployed in critical applications (e.g. law enforcement, financial lending), it becomes important to ensure that we clearly understand the…

Cited by 174SourcePDFScholar
2021

Fair Influence Maximization: a Welfare Optimization Approach

AAAI 2021technical

Several behavioral, social, and public health interventions, such as suicide/HIV prevention or community preparedness against natural disasters, leverage social network information to maximize outreach. Algorithmic influence maximization techniques have been proposed to aid with the choice of ``peer…

Cited by 74SourcePDFScholar
2021

Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainability

NeurIPS 2021poster

As black box explanations are increasingly being employed to establish model credibility in high stakes settings, it is important to ensure that these explanations are accurate and reliable. However, prior work demonstrates that explanations generated by state-of-the-art techniques are inconsistent,…

Cited by 218SourcePDFScholar
2021

Towards a unified framework for fair and stable graph representation learning

UAI 2021poster

As the representations output by Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are increasingly employed in real-world applications, it becomes important to ensure that these representations are fair and stable. In this work, we establish a key connection between counterfactual fairness and stability and leverage it…

2021

Towards the Unification and Robustness of Perturbation and Gradient Based Explanations

ICML 2021spotlight

As machine learning black boxes are increasingly being deployed in critical domains such as healthcare and criminal justice, there has been a growing emphasis on developing techniques for explaining these black boxes in a post hoc manner. In this work, we analyze two popular post hoc interpretation…

Cited by 82SourcePDFScholar
2020

Beyond Individualized Recourse: Interpretable and Interactive Summaries of Actionable Recourses

NeurIPS 2020poster

As predictive models are increasingly being deployed in high-stakes decision-making, there has been a lot of interest in developing algorithms which can provide recourses to affected individuals. While developing such tools is important, it is even more critical to analyze and interpret a predictive…

Cited by 115SourcePDFScholar
2020

Incorporating Interpretable Output Constraints in Bayesian Neural Networks

NeurIPS 2020spotlight

Domains where supervised models are deployed often come with task-specific constraints, such as prior expert knowledge on the ground-truth function, or desiderata like safety and fairness. We introduce a novel probabilistic framework for reasoning with such constraints and formulate a prior that ena…

2016

Confusions over Time: An Interpretable Bayesian Model to Characterize Trends in Decision Making

NeurIPS 2016poster

We propose Confusions over Time (CoT), a novel generative framework which facilitates a multi-granular analysis of the decision making process. The CoT not only models the confusions or error properties of individual decision makers and their evolution over time, but also allows us to obtain diagnos…

Cited by 16SourcePDFScholar