← Search

Joel Hestness

9 accepted papers

2026

Don't Drop Dropout: Optimizing Layer Sparsity for Efficient LLM Training and Inference

ICML 2026poster

Layer dropout (a.k.a.\ stochastic depth) has been shown to enable faster training, higher accuracy, and robustness to zero-shot layer pruning in both language and vision transformers. However, as models and datasets have scaled, dropout---particularly layer dropout---has largely disappeared from LLM…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

Predicting Training Re-evaluation Curves Enables Effective Data Curriculums for LLMs

ICLR 2026poster

Data curriculums have become central to successful LLM training, yet principles governing optimal data placement remain unclear. We introduce the *training re-evaluation curve (TREC)*, a diagnostic that retrospectively evaluates training batches *using the final model weights*. The TREC characterize…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

Scaling with Collapse: Efficient and Predictable Training of LLM Families

ICLR 2026poster

Effective LLM training relies on *consistency*, meaning that key quantities—such as final losses and optimal hyperparameters—scale predictably across model sizes. Qiu et al. (2025) recently showed that this consistency extends beyond scalars: whole training loss curves can *collapse* onto a universa…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Don't be lazy: CompleteP enables compute-efficient deep transformers

NeurIPS 2025poster

We study compute efficiency of LLM training when using different parameterizations, i.e., rules for adjusting model and optimizer hyperparameters (HPs) as model size changes. Some parameterizations fail to transfer optimal base HPs (such as learning rate) across changes in model depth, requiring pra…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2025

Power Lines: Scaling laws for weight decay and batch size in LLM pre-training

NeurIPS 2025poster

Efficient LLM pre-training requires well-tuned hyperparameters (HPs), including learning rate η and weight decay λ. We study scaling laws for HPs: formulas for how to scale HPs as we scale model size N, dataset size D, and batch size B. Recent work suggests the AdamW timescale, τ = B/(ηλD), should…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Straight to Zero: Why Linearly Decaying the Learning Rate to Zero Works Best for LLMs

ICLR 2025poster

LLMs are commonly trained with a learning rate (LR) warmup, followed by cosine decay to 10% of the maximum (10x decay). In a large-scale empirical study, we show that under an optimal peak LR, a simple linear decay-to-zero (D2Z) schedule consistently outperforms other schedules when training at comp…

Cited by 2SourcePDFScholar
2024

MediSwift: Efficient Sparse Pre-trained Biomedical Language Models

ACL 2024findings

Large language models (LLMs) are typically trained on general source data forvarious domains, but a recent surge in domain-specific LLMs has shown theirpotential to outperform general-purpose models in domain-specific tasks (e.g.,biomedicine). Although domain-specific pre-training enhances efficienc…

2024

Normalization Layer Per-Example Gradients are Sufficient to Predict Gradient Noise Scale in Transformers

NeurIPS 2024poster

Per-example gradient norms are a vital ingredient for estimating gradient noise scale (GNS) with minimal variance. Observing the tensor contractions required to compute them, we propose a method with minimal FLOPs in 3D or greater tensor regimes by simultaneously computing the norms while computing…

2024

Sparse maximal update parameterization: A holistic approach to sparse training dynamics

NeurIPS 2024poster

Several challenges make it difficult for sparse neural networks to compete with dense models. First, setting a large fraction of weights to zero impairs forward and gradient signal propagation. Second, sparse studies often need to test multiple sparsity levels, while also introducing new hyperparam…