4 accepted papers
We argue that the dominant paradigm of AI evaluation, which focuses on autonomous superhuman performance and so an implicit goal of replacing humans, is guiding AI development in the wrong direction. Instead, the AI community should pivot to evaluating the performance of human–AI teams. We argue tha…
We present the first large-scale empirical analysis of disempowerment patterns in real-world AI assistant interactions, analyzing 1.5 million consumer Claude.ai conversations using a privacy-preserving approach. We focus on situational dis-empowerment potential, which occurs when AI assistant intera…
This paper examines the systemic risks posed by incremental advancements in artificial intelligence, developing the concept of `gradual disempowerment', in contrast to the abrupt takeover scenarios commonly discussed in AI safety. We analyze how even incremental improvements in AI capabilities can u…
Language models (LMs) can exhibit human-like behaviour, but it is unclear how to describe this behaviour without undue anthropomorphism. We formalise a behaviourist view of LM character traits: qualities such as truthfulness, sycophancy, and coherent beliefs and intentions, which may manifest as con…