← Search

Tengyang Xie

25 accepted papers

2025

Correcting the Mythos of KL-Regularization: Direct Alignment without Overoptimization via Chi-Squared Preference Optimization

ICLR 2025spotlight

Language model alignment methods such as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) have led to impressive advances in language model capabilities, but are limited by a widely observed phenomenon known as *overoptimization*, where the quality of the language model degrades over the course of…

Cited by 13SourcePDFScholar
2025

Do We Need to Verify Step by Step? Rethinking Process Supervision from a Theoretical Perspective

ICML 2025poster

Process and outcome supervision represent two fundamental approaches to reinforcement learning, especially for complex reasoning tasks in large language models. While process supervision offers intuitive advantages for long-term credit assignment, the precise relationship between these paradigms h…

Cited by 13SourcePDFScholar
2025

Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHF

ICLR 2025poster

This paper investigates a basic question in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) from a theoretical perspective: how to efficiently explore in an online manner under preference feedback and general function approximation. We take the initial step towards a theoretical understanding of t…

Cited by 37SourcePDFScholar
2025

Outcome-Based Online Reinforcement Learning: Algorithms and Fundamental Limits

NeurIPS 2025poster

Reinforcement learning with outcome-based feedback faces a fundamental challenge: when rewards are only observed at trajectory endpoints, how do we assign credit to the right actions? This paper provides the first comprehensive analysis of this problem in online RL with general function approximatio…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Trajectory Bellman Residual Minimization: A Simple Value-Based Method for LLM Reasoning

NeurIPS 2025poster

Policy-based methods currently dominate reinforcement learning (RL) pipelines for large language model (LLM) reasoning, leaving value-based approaches largely unexplored. We revisit the classical paradigm of Bellman Residual Minimization and introduce Trajectory Bellman Residual Minimization (TBRM),…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2024

CounterCurate: Enhancing Physical and Semantic Visio-Linguistic Compositional Reasoning via Counterfactual Examples

ACL 2024findings

We propose CounterCurate, a framework to comprehensively improve the visio-linguistic compositional reasoning capability for both contrastive and generative multimodal models. In particular, we identify two critical under- explored problems: the neglect of physically grounded reasoning (counting and…

2024

Harnessing Density Ratios for Online Reinforcement Learning

ICLR 2024spotlight

The theories of offline and online reinforcement learning, despite having evolved in parallel, have begun to show signs of the possibility for a unification, with algorithms and analysis techniques for one setting often having natural counterparts in the other. However, the notion of *density ratio…

Cited by 16SourcePDFScholar
2024

Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Experts

EMNLP 2024finding

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as the primary method for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. The RLHF process typically starts by training a reward model (RM) using human preference data. Conventional RMs are trained on pairwise responses to t…

2024

Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Data

ICML 2024poster

Learning from preference labels plays a crucial role in fine-tuning large language models --- this is done via supervised learning, on-policy reinforcement learning (RL), or contrastive learning. Different methods come with different implementation tradeoffs, and existing empirical findings present…

2024

Towards Principled Representation Learning from Videos for Reinforcement Learning

ICLR 2024spotlight

We study pre-training representations for decision-making using video data, which is abundantly available for tasks such as game agents and software testing. Even though significant empirical advances have been made on this problem, a theoretical understanding remains absent. We initiate the theoret…

2023

Adversarial Model for Offline Reinforcement Learning

NeurIPS 2023poster

We propose a novel model-based offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) framework, called Adversarial Model for Offline Reinforcement Learning (ARMOR), which can robustly learn policies to improve upon an arbitrary reference policy regardless of data coverage. ARMOR is designed to optimize policies for t…

Cited by 40SourcePDFScholar
2023

The Role of Coverage in Online Reinforcement Learning

ICLR 2023top-5%

Coverage conditions---which assert that the data logging distribution adequately covers the state space---play a fundamental role in determining the sample complexity of offline reinforcement learning. While such conditions might seem irrelevant to online reinforcement learning at first glance, we e…

Cited by 89SourcePDFScholar
2022

Adversarially Trained Actor Critic for Offline Reinforcement Learning

ICML 2022oral

We propose Adversarially Trained Actor Critic (ATAC), a new model-free algorithm for offline reinforcement learning (RL) under insufficient data coverage, based on the concept of relative pessimism. ATAC is designed as a two-player Stackelberg game framing of offline RL: A policy actor competes agai…

2022

Interaction-Grounded Learning with Action-Inclusive Feedback

NeurIPS 2022accept

Consider the problem setting of Interaction-Grounded Learning (IGL), in which a learner's goal is to optimally interact with the environment with no explicit reward to ground its policies. The agent observes a context vector, takes an action, and receives a feedback vector, using this information to…

Cited by 7SourcePDFScholar
2021

Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learning

NeurIPS 2021oral

The use of pessimism, when reasoning about datasets lacking exhaustive exploration has recently gained prominence in offline reinforcement learning. Despite the robustness it adds to the algorithm, overly pessimistic reasoning can be equally damaging in precluding the discovery of good policies, whi…

Cited by 319SourcePDFScholar
2021

Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement Learning

NeurIPS 2021poster

Recent theoretical work studies sample-efficient reinforcement learning (RL) extensively in two settings: learning interactively in the environment (online RL), or learning from an offline dataset (offline RL). However, existing algorithms and theories for learning near-optimal policies in these two…

Cited by 196SourcePDFScholar
2019

Towards Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning with Marginalized Importance Sampling

NeurIPS 2019poster

Motivated by the many real-world applications of reinforcement learning (RL) that require safe-policy iterations, we consider the problem of off-policy evaluation (OPE) --- the problem of evaluating a new policy using the historical data obtained by different behavior policies --- under the model o…

Cited by 206SourcePDFScholar
2018

A Block Coordinate Ascent Algorithm for Mean-Variance Optimization

NeurIPS 2018poster

Risk management in dynamic decision problems is a primary concern in many fields, including financial investment, autonomous driving, and healthcare. The mean-variance function is one of the most widely used objective functions in risk management due to its simplicity and interpretability. Existing…

Cited by 44SourcePDFScholar