← Search

Xinyu Hu

23 accepted papers

2026

Multi-timescale Reinforcement Learning by Value Reconstruction

ICML 2026poster

Most reinforcement learning (RL) baselines maximize future cumulative rewards with a fixed single discount factor, which limits their performance in complex sequential decision-making tasks due to a failure to balance short-term objectives and long-term planning. To address this issue, this paper fo…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

SCOPE: Intrinsic Semantic Space Control for Mitigating Copyright Infringement in LLMs

AAAI 2026technical

Large language models sometimes inadvertently reproduce passages that are copyrighted, exposing downstream applications to legal risk. Most existing studies for inference-time defences focus on surface-level token matching and rely on external blocklists or filters, which add deployment complexity a

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2026

Structured Expert Routing with Multi-View Task Priors for Offline Meta-Reinforcement Learning

ICML 2026poster

Offline meta-reinforcement learning requires agents to generalize to unseen tasks from fixed datasets, yet existing sequence-based and MoE-based methods rely on implicit or token-level routing signals that fail to capture task-level structure. We propose the **Task-Guided Router (TGR)**, a structure…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

Tricks or Traps? A Deep Dive into RL for LLM Reasoning

ICLR 2026poster

Reinforcement learning (RL) for LLM reasoning has rapidly emerged as a prominent research area, marked by a significant surge in related studies on both algorithmic innovations and practical applications. Despite this progress, several critical challenges remain, including the absence of standardize…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2025

A Dual-Perspective NLG Meta-Evaluation Framework with Automatic Benchmark and Better Interpretability

ACL 2025long

In NLG meta-evaluation, evaluation metrics are typically assessed based on their consistency with humans. However, we identify some limitations in traditional NLG meta-evaluation approaches, such as issues in handling human ratings and ambiguous selections of correlation measures, which undermine th…

2025

Analyzing and Evaluating Correlation Measures in NLG Meta-Evaluation

NAACL 2025long

The correlation between NLG automatic evaluation metrics and human evaluation is often regarded as a critical criterion for assessing the capability of an evaluation metric. However, different grouping methods and correlation coefficients result in various types of correlation measures used in meta-…

2025

DAMON: A Dialogue-Aware MCTS Framework for Jailbreaking Large Language Models

EMNLP 2025

While large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities across a wide range of tasks, they remain vulnerable to generating outputs that are potentially harmful. Red teaming, which involves crafting adversarial inputs to expose vulnerabilities, is a widely adopted approach for evaluati

2025

Evaluating Self-Generated Documents for Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Large Language Models

NAACL 2025findings

The integration of documents generated by LLMs themselves (Self-Docs) alongside retrieved documents has emerged as a promising strategy for retrieval-augmented generation systems. However, previous research primarily focuses on optimizing the use of Self-Docs, with their inherent properties remainin…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

GRNFormer: A Biologically-Guided Framework for Integrating Gene Regulatory Networks into RNA Foundation Models

ACL 2025finding

Foundation models for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) have shown promising capabilities in capturing gene expression patterns. However, current approaches face critical limitations: they ignore biological prior knowledge encoded in gene regulatory relationships and fail to leverage multi-omic…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

ICR Probe: Tracking Hidden State Dynamics for Reliable Hallucination Detection in LLMs

ACL 2025long

Large language models (LLMs) excel at various natural language processing tasks, but their tendency to generate hallucinations undermines their reliability. Existing hallucination detection methods leveraging hidden states predominantly focus on static and isolated representations, overlooking their…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

MC-MKE: A Fine-Grained Multimodal Knowledge Editing Benchmark Emphasizing Modality Consistency

ACL 2025finding

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are prone to non-factual or outdated knowledge issues, highlighting the importance of knowledge editing. Many benchmark has been proposed for researching multimodal knowledge editing. However, previous benchmarks focus on limited scenarios due to the lack of…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

Re-evaluating Automatic LLM System Ranking for Alignment with Human Preference

NAACL 2025findings

Evaluating and ranking the capabilities of different LLMs is crucial for understanding their performance and alignment with human preferences. Due to the high cost and time-consuming nature of human evaluations, an automatic LLM bencher (i.e., an automatic evaluation framework that aims to rank LLMs…

2025

STORM-BORN: A Challenging Mathematical Derivations Dataset Curated via a Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Framework

ACL 2025finding

High-quality math datasets are crucial for advancing the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). However, existing datasets often suffer from three key issues: outdated and insufficient challenging content, neglecting human-like reasoning, and limited reliability due to single-LLM gener…

2025

Towards A “Novel” Benchmark: Evaluating Literary Fiction with Large Language Models

ACL 2025finding

Current exploration on creative generation focuses mainly on short stories, poetry, and scripts. With the expansion of Large Language Models (LLMs) context windows, “novel” avenues emerge. This study aims to extend the boundaries of Natural Language Generation (NLG) evaluation by exploring LLMs’ cap…

2024

Are LLM-based Evaluators Confusing NLG Quality Criteria?

ACL 2024long

Some prior work has shown that LLMs perform well in NLG evaluation for different tasks. However, we discover that LLMs seem to confuse different evaluation criteria, which reduces their reliability. For further verification, we first consider avoiding issues of inconsistent conceptualization and vag…

2024

Evoke: Evoking Critical Thinking Abilities in LLMs via Reviewer-Author Prompt Editing

ICLR 2024poster

Large language models (LLMs) have made impressive progress in natural language processing. These models rely on proper human instructions (or prompts) to generate suitable responses. However, the potential of LLMs are not fully harnessed by commonly-used prompting methods: many human-in-the-loop alg…

Cited by 7SourcePDFScholar
2024

Solving Inverse Problems with Latent Diffusion Models via Hard Data Consistency

ICLR 2024spotlight

Latent diffusion models have been demonstrated to generate high-quality images, while offering efficiency in model training compared to diffusion models operating in the pixel space. However, incorporating latent diffusion models to solve inverse problems remains a challenging problem due to the non…

2024

Task Oriented In-Domain Data Augmentation

EMNLP 2024main

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown superior performance in various applications and fields. To achieve better performance on specialized domains such as law and advertisement, LLMs are often continue pre-trained on in-domain data. However, existing approaches suffer from two major issues. First…

2024

Themis: A Reference-free NLG Evaluation Language Model with Flexibility and Interpretability

EMNLP 2024main

The evaluation of natural language generation (NLG) tasks is a significant and longstanding research area. With the recent emergence of powerful large language models (LLMs), some studies have turned to LLM-based automatic evaluation methods, which demonstrate great potential to become a new evaluat…