← Search

Aviral Kumar

76 accepted papers

2026

IsoCompute Playbook: Optimally Scaling Sampling Compute for LLM RL

ICML 2026poster

While scaling laws guide compute allocation for LLM pre-training, analogous prescriptions for reinforcement learning (RL) post-training of LLMs remain poorly understood. We study the compute-optimal allocation of sampling compute for on-policy RL methods in LLMs, framing scaling as a compute-constra…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

Long-Context Robot Imitation Learning by Focusing on Key History Frames

RSS 2026poster

Many useful robot tasks require attending to the history of past observations. For example, finding an item in a room requires remembering which places have already been searched. However, the best-performing robot policies typically condition only on the current observation, limiting their applicab…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

Patching Gaps In LLM Reasoning With Interventional Training

ICLR 2026poster

Reinforcement learning (RL) training of large language models (LLMs) is limited by the policy's ability to generate rollouts with non-zero rewards: without such rewards, the policy is not updated and learning is stalled on hard problems, which are problems that the policy consistently fails to sampl…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

RLAD: Training LLMs to Discover Abstractions for Solving Reasoning Problems

ICLR 2026poster

Reasoning requires going beyond pattern matching or memorization of solutions to identify and implement algorithmic procedures that can be used to deduce answers to hard problems. Doing so requires reusing primitives, intermediate results, or procedures across multiple problems. While RL post-traini…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

Reasoning Cache: Learning to Extrapolate to Long Lengths via Short-Length RL

ICML 2026poster

Large Language Models (LLMs) that continue improving at test-time budgets far beyond their training budgets can solve harder problems by leveraging additional inference compute: we refer to this property as extrapolation. Standard on-policy RL operates on fixed problem distributions and training bud…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

Reinforcement Learning from Dynamic Critic Feedback for Free-Form Generations

ICLR 2026poster

Open-ended generation tasks require outputs to satisfy diverse and often implicit task-specific evaluation rubrics. The sheer number of relevant rubrics leads to prohibitively high verification costs and incomplete assessments of a response, making reinforcement learning (RL) post-training with rubr…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

TRIM: Hybrid Inference via Targeted Stepwise Routing in Multi-Step Reasoning Tasks

ICLR 2026poster

Multi-step reasoning tasks like mathematical problem solving are vulnerable to cascading failures where a single incorrect step leads to complete solution breakdown. Current LLM routing methods assign entire queries to one model, treating all reasoning steps as equal. We propose TRIM (Targeted Routi…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2026

WebGym: Scaling Training Environments for Long-Horizon Visual Web Agents with Realistic Tasks

CVPR 2026

We present WebGym, the largest-to-date open-source environment for training realistic visual web agents. Real websites are non-stationary and diverse, making artificial or small-scale task sets insufficient for robust policy learning. WebGym contains nearly 300,000 tasks with rubric-based evaluation

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2026

e3: Learning to Explore Enables Extrapolation of Test-Time Compute for LLMs

ICLR 2026poster

Test-time scaling offers a promising path to improve LLM reasoning by utilizing more compute at inference time; however, the true promise of this paradigm lies in extrapolation (i.e., improvement in performance on hard problems as LLMs keep "thinking" for longer, beyond the maximum token budget they…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2026

floq: Training Critics via Flow-Matching for Scaling Compute in Value-Based RL

ICLR 2026poster

A hallmark of modern large-scale machine learning techniques is the use of training objectives that provide dense supervision to intermediate computations, such as teacher forcing the next token in language models or denoising step-by-step in diffusion models. This enables models to learn complex fu…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2025

Bigger, Regularized, Categorical: High-Capacity Value Functions are Efficient Multi-Task Learners

NeurIPS 2025poster

Recent advances in language modeling and vision stem from training large models on diverse, multi‑task data. This paradigm has had limited impact in value-based reinforcement learning (RL), where improvements are often driven by small models trained in a single-task context. This is because in multi…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Compute-Optimal Scaling for Value-Based Deep RL

NeurIPS 2025poster

As models grow larger and training them becomes expensive, it becomes increasingly important to scale training recipes not just to larger models and more data, but to do so in a compute-optimal manner that extracts maximal performance per unit of compute. While such scaling has been well studied for…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2025

Digi-Q: Learning VLM Q-Value Functions for Training Device-Control Agents

ICLR 2025poster

While a number of existing approaches for building foundation model agents rely on prompting or fine-tuning with human demonstrations, it is not sufficient in dynamic environments (e.g., mobile device control). On-policy reinforcement learning (RL) should address these limitations, but collecting ac…

2025

Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tuning Need Not Retain Offline Data

ICLR 2025poster

The modern paradigm in machine learning involves pre-training on diverse data, followed by task-specific fine-tuning. In reinforcement learning (RL), this translates to learning via offline RL on a diverse historical dataset, followed by rapid online RL fine-tuning using interaction data. Most RL fi…

2025

Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Prediction

ICLR 2025poster

Verifiers or reward models are often used to enhance the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs). A common approach is the Best-of-N method, where N candidate solutions generated by the LLM are ranked by a verifier, and the best one is selected. While LLM-based verifiers are typically…

Cited by 107SourcePDFScholar
2025

Grounded Reinforcement Learning for Visual Reasoning

NeurIPS 2025poster

While reinforcement learning (RL) over chains of thought has significantly advanced language models in tasks such as mathematics and coding, visual reasoning introduces added complexity by requiring models to direct visual attention, interpret perceptual inputs, and ground abstract reasoning in spat…

Cited by 0SourcecodeScholar
2025

Horizon Reduction Makes RL Scalable

NeurIPS 2025spotlight

In this work, we study the scalability of offline reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. In principle, a truly scalable offline RL algorithm should be able to solve any given problem, regardless of its complexity, given sufficient data, compute, and model capacity. We investigate if and how current…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Inference-Aware Fine-Tuning for Best-of-N Sampling in Large Language Models

ICLR 2025poster

Recent studies indicate that effectively utilizing inference-time compute is crucial for attaining good performance from large language models (LLMs). Specifically, the Best-of-N (BoN) inference strategy, where an LLM generates multiple responses and a verifier selects the best, has shown strong emp…

Cited by 18SourcePDFScholar
2025

Optimizing Test-Time Compute via Meta Reinforcement Finetuning

ICML 2025poster

Training models to efficiently use test-time compute is crucial for improving the reasoning performance of LLMs. While current methods mostly do so via fine-tuning on search traces or running RL against the 0/1 outcome reward, do these approaches efficiently utilize test-time compute? Would these ap…

Cited by 21SourcePDFScholar
2025

RRM: Robust Reward Model Training Mitigates Reward Hacking

ICLR 2025poster

Reward models (RMs) play a pivotal role in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. However, traditional RM training, which relies on response pairs tied to specific prompts, struggles to disentangle prompt-driven preferences from prompt-independent artifacts, such as response l…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning

ICLR 2025spotlight

A promising approach for improving reasoning in large language models is to use process reward models (PRMs). PRMs provide feedback at each step of a multi-step reasoning trace, improving credit assignment over outcome reward models (ORMs) that only provide feedback at the final step. However, colle…

Cited by 59SourcePDFScholar
2025

Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally Can be More Effective than Scaling Parameters for Reasoning

ICLR 2025oral

Enabling LLMs to improve their outputs by using more test-time compute is a critical step towards building self-improving agents that can operate on open-ended natural language. In this paper, we scale up inference-time computation in LLMs, with a focus on answering: if an LLM is allowed to use a fi…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

Scaling Test-Time Compute Without Verification or RL is Suboptimal

ICML 2025spotlight

Despite substantial advances in scaling test-time compute, an ongoing debate in the community is how it should be scaled up to enable continued and efficient improvements with scaling. There are largely two approaches: (i) distilling successful search or thinking traces; and (ii), using verification…

Cited by 8SourcePDFScholar
2025

Thinking vs. Doing: Improving Agent Reasoning by Scaling Test-Time Interaction

NeurIPS 2025poster

Test-time scaling in agentic tasks often relies on generating long reasoning traces ("think" more) before acting, but this does not allow agents to acquire new information from the environment or adapt behavior over time. In this work, we propose scaling test-time interaction, an untapped dimension…

Cited by 0SourceScholar
2025

Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learning

ICLR 2025oral

Self-correction is a highly desirable capability of large language models (LLMs), yet it has consistently been found to be largely ineffective in modern LLMs. Current methods for training self-correction typically depend on either multiple models, a more advanced model, or additional forms of super…

Cited by 113SourcePDFScholar
2025

Unfamiliar Finetuning Examples Control How Language Models Hallucinate

NAACL 2025long

Large language models are known to hallucinate, but the underlying mechanism that govern how models hallucinate are not yet fully understood. In this work, we find that unfamiliar examples in the models’ finetuning data – those that introduce concepts beyond the base model’s scope of knowledge – are…

2025

Value-Based Deep RL Scales Predictably

ICML 2025poster

Scaling data and compute is critical in modern machine learning. However, scaling also demands _predictability_: we want methods to not only perform well with more compute or data, but also have their performance be predictable from low compute or low data runs, without ever running the large-scale…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2025

What Do Learning Dynamics Reveal About Generalization in LLM Mathematical Reasoning?

ICML 2025poster

Modern large language models (LLMs) excel at fitting finetuning data, but often struggle on unseen examples. In order to teach models genuine reasoning abilities rather than superficial pattern matching, our work aims to better understand how the learning dynamics of LLM finetuning shapes downstream…

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2024

ArCHer: Training Language Model Agents via Hierarchical Multi-Turn RL

ICML 2024poster

Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to tackle sequential decision-making problems due to their generalist capabilities. Instead of optimizing ``myopic'' surrogate objectives such as human preferences within a single turn, in such problems, we wish to directly optimize long-term objective…

2024

Designing Cell-Type-Specific Promoter Sequences Using Conservative Model-Based Optimization

NeurIPS 2024poster

Gene therapies have the potential to treat disease by delivering therapeutic genetic cargo to disease-associated cells. One limitation to their widespread use is the lack of short regulatory sequences, or promoters, that differentially induce the expression of delivered genetic cargo in target cells…

2024

DigiRL: Training In-The-Wild Device-Control Agents with Autonomous Reinforcement Learning

NeurIPS 2024poster

Pre-trained vision language models (VLMs), though powerful, typically lack training on decision-centric data, rendering them sub-optimal for decision-making tasks such as in-the-wild device control through Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) when used off-the-shelf. While training with static demonstra…

Cited by 40SourcePDFScholar
2024

Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL?

NeurIPS 2024poster

While imitation learning requires access to high-quality data, offline reinforcement learning (RL) should, in principle, perform similarly or better with substantially lower data quality by using a value function. However, current results indicate that offline RL often performs worse than imitation…

Cited by 14SourcePDFScholar
2024

Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Data

ICML 2024poster

Learning from preference labels plays a crucial role in fine-tuning large language models --- this is done via supervised learning, on-policy reinforcement learning (RL), or contrastive learning. Different methods come with different implementation tradeoffs, and existing empirical findings present…

2024

RL on Incorrect Synthetic Data Scales the Efficiency of LLM Math Reasoning by Eight-Fold

NeurIPS 2024poster

Training on model-generated synthetic data is a promising approach for finetuning LLMs, but it remains unclear when it helps or hurts. In this paper, we investigate this question for math reasoning via an empirical study, followed by building a conceptual understanding of our observations. First, we…

2024

Recursive Introspection: Teaching Language Model Agents How to Self-Improve

NeurIPS 2024poster

A central piece in enabling intelligent agentic behavior in foundation models is to make them capable of introspecting upon their behavior, reasoning, and correcting their mistakes as more computation or interaction is available. Even the strongest proprietary large language models (LLMs) do not qui…

Cited by 39SourcePDFScholar
2024

Robotic Offline RL from Internet Videos via Value-Function Learning

ICRA 2024poster

Pre-training on Internet data has proven to be a key ingredient for broad generalization in many modern ML systems. What would it take to enable such capabilities in robotic reinforcement learning (RL)? Offline RL methods, which learn from datasets of robot experience, offer one way to leverage prio…

Cited by 4SourceScholar
2024

Steering Your Generalists: Improving Robotic Foundation Models via Value Guidance

CoRL 2024poster

Large, general-purpose robotic policies trained on diverse demonstration datasets have been shown to be remarkably effective both for controlling a variety of robots in a range of different scenes, and for acquiring broad repertoires of manipulation skills. However, the data that such policies are t…

Cited by 7SourcecodeScholar
2024

Stop Regressing: Training Value Functions via Classification for Scalable Deep RL

ICML 2024oral

Value functions are an essential component in deep reinforcement learning (RL), that are typically trained via mean squared error regression to match bootstrapped target values. However, scaling value-based RL methods to large networks has proven challenging. This difficulty is in stark contrast to…

Cited by 60SourcePDFScholar
2024

Zero-Shot Robotic Manipulation with Pre-Trained Image-Editing Diffusion Models

ICLR 2024poster

If generalist robots are to operate in truly unstructured environments, they need to be able to recognize and reason about novel objects and scenarios. Such objects and scenarios might not be present in the robot’s own training data. We propose SuSIE, a method that leverages an image-editing diffusi…

2023

Action-Quantized Offline Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Skill Learning

CoRL 2023poster

The offline reinforcement learning (RL) paradigm provides a general recipe to convert static behavior datasets into policies that can perform better than the policy that collected the data. While policy constraints, conservatism, and other methods for mitigating distributional shifts have made offli…

Cited by 25SourcecodeScholar
2023

Beyond Uniform Sampling: Offline Reinforcement Learning with Imbalanced Datasets

NeurIPS 2023poster

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) enables learning a decision-making policy without interaction with the environment. This makes it particularly beneficial in situations where such interactions are costly. However, a known challenge for offline RL algorithms is the distributional mismatch between…

2023

Cal-QL: Calibrated Offline RL Pre-Training for Efficient Online Fine-Tuning

NeurIPS 2023poster

A compelling use case of offline reinforcement learning (RL) is to obtain a policy initialization from existing datasets followed by fast online fine-tuning with limited interaction. However, existing offline RL methods tend to behave poorly during fine-tuning. In this paper, we devise an approach f…

2023

Confidence-Conditioned Value Functions for Offline Reinforcement Learning

ICLR 2023top-5%

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) promises the ability to learn effective policies solely using existing, static datasets, without any costly online interaction. To do so, offline RL methods must handle distributional shift between the dataset and the learned policy. The most common approach is to…

Cited by 23SourcePDFScholar
2023

Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning Requires Regulating Overfitting

ICLR 2023poster

Deep reinforcement learning algorithms that learn policies by trial-and-error must learn from limited amounts of data collected by actively interacting with the environment. While many prior works have shown that proper regularization techniques are crucial for enabling data-efficient RL, a general…

Cited by 38SourcePDFScholar
2023

Offline Q-learning on Diverse Multi-Task Data Both Scales And Generalizes

ICLR 2023top-5%

The potential of offline reinforcement learning (RL) is that high-capacity models trained on large, heterogeneous datasets can lead to agents that generalize broadly, analogously to similar advances in vision and NLP. However, recent works argue that offline RL methods encounter unique challenges to…

Cited by 61SourcePDFScholar
2023

Pre-Training for Robots: Offline RL Enables Learning New Tasks in a Handful of Trials

RSS 2023poster

Progress in deep learning highlights the tremendous potential of utilizing diverse datasets for attaining effective generalization and makes it enticing to consider leveraging broad datasets for attaining robust generalization in robotic learning as well. However, in practice we often want to learn…

Cited by 80SourcePDFScholar
2023

Q-Transformer: Scalable Offline Reinforcement Learning via Autoregressive Q-Functions

CoRL 2023poster

In this work, we present a scalable reinforcement learning method for training multi-task policies from large offline datasets that can leverage both human demonstrations and autonomously collected data. Our method uses a Transformer to provide a scalable representation for Q-functions trained via o…

Cited by 106SourceScholar
2023

ReDS: Offline RL With Heteroskedastic Datasets via Support Constraints

NeurIPS 2023poster

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) learns policies entirely from static datasets. Practical applications of offline RL will inevitably require learning from datasets where the variability of demonstrated behaviors changes non-uniformly across the state space. For example, at a red light, nearly all…

Cited by 5SourcePDFScholar
2022

DASCO: Dual-Generator Adversarial Support Constrained Offline Reinforcement Learning

NeurIPS 2022accept

In offline RL, constraining the learned policy to remain close to the data is essential to prevent the policy from outputting out-of-distribution (OOD) actions with erroneously overestimated values. In principle, generative adversarial networks (GAN) can provide an elegant solution to do so, with th…

Cited by 15SourcePDFScholar
2022

DR3: Value-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning Requires Explicit Regularization

ICLR 2022spotlight

Despite overparameterization, deep networks trained via supervised learning are surprisingly easy to optimize and exhibit excellent generalization. One hypothesis to explain this is that overparameterized deep networks enjoy the benefits of implicit regularization induced by stochastic gradient desc…

Cited by 70SourcePDFScholar
2022

Data-Driven Offline Decision-Making via Invariant Representation Learning

NeurIPS 2022accept

The goal in offline data-driven decision-making is synthesize decisions that optimize a black-box utility function, using a previously-collected static dataset, with no active interaction. These problems appear in many forms: offline reinforcement learning (RL), where we must produce actions that op…

Cited by 25SourcePDFScholar
2022

Data-Driven Offline Optimization for Architecting Hardware Accelerators

ICLR 2022poster

To attain higher efficiency, the industry has gradually reformed towards application-specific hardware accelerators. While such a paradigm shift is already starting to show promising results, designers need to spend considerable manual effort and perform large number of time-consuming simulations to…

2022

Design-Bench: Benchmarks for Data-Driven Offline Model-Based Optimization

ICML 2022spotlight

Black-box model-based optimization (MBO) problems, where the goal is to find a design input that maximizes an unknown objective function, are ubiquitous in a wide range of domains, such as the design of proteins, DNA sequences, aircraft, and robots. Solving model-based optimization problems typicall…

2022

Don’t Start From Scratch: Leveraging Prior Data to Automate Robotic Reinforcement Learning

CoRL 2022poster

Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms hold the promise of enabling autonomous skill acquisition for robotic systems. However, in practice, real-world robotic RL typically requires time consuming data collection and frequent human intervention to reset the environment. Moreover, robotic policies lea…

Cited by 48SourceScholar
2022

How to Leverage Unlabeled Data in Offline Reinforcement Learning

ICML 2022spotlight

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) can learn control policies from static datasets but, like standard RL methods, it requires reward annotations for every transition. In many cases, labeling large datasets with rewards may be costly, especially if those rewards must be provided by human labelers, w…

Cited by 85SourcePDFScholar
2022

Should I Run Offline Reinforcement Learning or Behavioral Cloning?

ICLR 2022poster

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms can acquire effective policies by utilizing only previously collected experience, without any online interaction. While it is widely understood that offline RL is able to extract good policies even from highly suboptimal data, in practice offline RL is…

Cited by 44SourcePDFScholar
2021

A Workflow for Offline Model-Free Robotic Reinforcement Learning

CoRL 2021oral

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) enables learning control policies by utilizing only prior experience, without any online interaction. This can allow robots to acquire generalizable skills from large and diverse datasets, without any costly or unsafe online data collection. Despite recent algorit…

Cited by 105SourceScholar
2021

Benchmarks for Deep Off-Policy Evaluation

ICLR 2021poster

Off-policy evaluation (OPE) holds the promise of being able to leverage large, offline datasets for both evaluating and selecting complex policies for decision making. The ability to learn offline is particularly important in many real-world domains, such as in healthcare, recommender systems, or ro…

2021

COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy Optimization

NeurIPS 2021poster

Model-based reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms, which learn a dynamics model from logged experience and perform conservative planning under the learned model, have emerged as a promising paradigm for offline reinforcement learning (offline RL). However, practical variants of such model-based alg…

Cited by 490SourcePDFScholar
2021

Conservative Data Sharing for Multi-Task Offline Reinforcement Learning

NeurIPS 2021poster

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms have shown promising results in domains where abundant pre-collected data is available. However, prior methods focus on solving individual problems from scratch with an offline dataset without considering how an offline RL agent can acquire multiple ski…

Cited by 90SourcePDFScholar
2021

Conservative Objective Models for Effective Offline Model-Based Optimization

ICML 2021spotlight

In this paper, we aim to solve data-driven model-based optimization (MBO) problems, where the goal is to find a design input that maximizes an unknown objective function provided access to only a static dataset of inputs and their corresponding objective values. Such data-driven optimization procedu…

2021

Conservative Safety Critics for Exploration

ICLR 2021poster

Safe exploration presents a major challenge in reinforcement learning (RL): when active data collection requires deploying partially trained policies, we must ensure that these policies avoid catastrophically unsafe regions, while still enabling trial and error learning. In this paper, we target the…

Cited by 168SourcePDFScholar
2021

Implicit Under-Parameterization Inhibits Data-Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning

ICLR 2021poster

We identify an implicit under-parameterization phenomenon in value-based deep RL methods that use bootstrapping: when value functions, approximated using deep neural networks, are trained with gradient descent using iterated regression onto target values generated by previous instances of the value…

Cited by 132SourcePDFScholar
2021

OPAL: Offline Primitive Discovery for Accelerating Offline Reinforcement Learning

ICLR 2021poster

Reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved impressive performance in a variety of online settings in which an agent’s ability to query the environment for transitions and rewards is effectively unlimited. However, in many practical applications, the situation is reversed: an agent may have access to…

Cited by 209SourcePDFScholar
2021

Why Generalization in RL is Difficult: Epistemic POMDPs and Implicit Partial Observability

NeurIPS 2021poster

Generalization is a central challenge for the deployment of reinforcement learning (RL) systems in the real world. In this paper, we show that the sequential structure of the RL problem necessitates new approaches to generalization beyond the well-studied techniques used in supervised learning. Whil…

Cited by 147SourcePDFScholar
2020

Chaining Behaviors from Data with Model-Free Reinforcement Learning

CoRL 2020

Reinforcement learning has been applied to a wide variety of robotics problems, but most of such applications involve collecting data from scratch for each new task. Since the amount of robot data we can collect for any single task is limited by time and cost considerations, the learned behavior is

Cited by 0SourcePDFScholar
2020

Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning

NeurIPS 2020poster

Effectively leveraging large, previously collected datasets in reinforcement learn- ing (RL) is a key challenge for large-scale real-world applications. Offline RL algorithms promise to learn effective policies from previously-collected, static datasets without further interaction. However, in pract…

2020

DisCor: Corrective Feedback in Reinforcement Learning via Distribution Correction

NeurIPS 2020spotlight

Deep reinforcement learning can learn effective policies for a wide range of tasks, but is notoriously difficult to use due to instability and sensitivity to hyperparameters. The reasons for this remain unclear. In this paper, we study how RL methods based on bootstrapping-based Q-learning can suffe…

Cited by 131SourcePDFScholar
2020

One Solution is Not All You Need: Few-Shot Extrapolation via Structured MaxEnt RL

NeurIPS 2020poster

While reinforcement learning algorithms can learn effective policies for complex tasks, these policies are often brittle to even minor task variations, especially when variations are not explicitly provided during training. One natural approach to this problem is to train agents with manually specif…

Cited by 115SourcePDFScholar
2019

Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reduction

NeurIPS 2019poster

Off-policy reinforcement learning aims to leverage experience collected from prior policies for sample-efficient learning. However, in practice, commonly used off-policy approximate dynamic programming methods based on Q-learning and actor-critic methods are highly sensitive to the data distribution…

Cited by 1291SourcePDFScholar
2018

Trainable Calibration Measures for Neural Networks from Kernel Mean Embeddings

ICML 2018oral

Modern neural networks have recently been found to be poorly calibrated, primarily in the direction of over-confidence. Methods like entropy penalty and temperature smoothing improve calibration by clamping confidence, but in doing so compromise the many legitimately confident predictions. We propos…